Skip to main content

Carson classic comedy material



On June 17, 1981, Johnny Carson made a weather-related observation.  "It was 107 degrees somewhere in Los Angeles today. But you know what everybody says?  I love this -- 107 today and they say, 'But there's no humidity in California!' There's no humidity in a nuclear meltdown either!"

On April 15, 1986, Johnny Carson levelled with his audience on another matter: "California ball players, let's be honest, are a little too mellow. Out here, a player steals a base and he has to go to a psychiatrist to deal with the guilt."

And last than a month later, May 8, 1986, he was in a re-assuring mood.  He told them: "Do not worry. I want to point out that the radiation from the applause sign is equivalent tro only two dental X-rays."


Labels:

Comments

  1. RDAugust 19, 2012 at 2:23 PM

    I grew up in the Carson era but never bonded with him. Too plebean for my snobbish tastes. We snobs preferred the other talk show host from Nebraska, Dick Cavett. Then a few years ago I discovered this by Carson,

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slCNTz72o4s

    and decided that there was a place in my heart for Johnny after all.

    I AM a Jack Webb fan. Joe Friday was the greatest fictional American police inspector ever.

    I live outside of the USA. When people ask me for an example of the paradigmatic American accent, I direct them to Jack Webb on YouTube. Carson's Nebraska voice isn't bad either.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherAugust 20, 2012 at 9:35 AM

      RD, Thank you for showing such an interest in my humble blog in recent days.

      As to Carson, I remember when my older brother started wearing Nehru jackets because Johnny Carson had worn a Nehru jacket. It didn't last, but it was cool for a while.

      It took a few years yet before our parents would let me stay up long enough to watch Johnny except on special occasions.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
17 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more