Skip to main content

More Travel Notes

In St Louis we were parked awhile at an unimpressive-looking train station in an equally unimpressive neighborhood. One woman in my car was sure that this wasn't the "main" St Louis Station. She would get off at the next stop, she said, which would be the main one, downtown.

Staff did with some difficulty persuade her that yes, this was THE St. Louis station and that if she didn't get off she would end up at the real next stop, several miles away.

It was by now fairly late on Friday, and I fell sleep not long after we had pulled out of the main and only St Louis station.

I awoke in northern Texas. Marshall, Texas, if I remember rightly.

Longview Texas was next, and those on the train who wanted to go to Houston had to get off at Longview to make their connection.

Around 11:20 those of us still on the Eagle were in Dallas. We had about a 20 minute stop over. I got out of the train to stretch the legs a bit and because I hoped to find a newspaper. The sole vendor of a newspaper in or around the station house was a mechanical one, one that wanted a full dollar in coins. I only had three quarters, so went about looking for someone, machine or human, who could make change. The place was, as you might have imagined from what I've just said, threadbare of activity.  Quite a contrast to Chicago in this. Eventually, in fear of missing my train, I had to forego the pleasure of reading up on things in Dallas.

Austin, TX, too, has a small station, but it had nice architecture. We didn't pass through there until the sun was setting. Was it 8-ish? I don't know.

Anyway, those few of us left on the train by 11 that evening arrived in San Antonio. I took a cab to my hotel rather than walk the mile or so.

I encountered a talkative cabbie who told me a story that brought me back, in a sense, to Connecticut. He said he had been driving his cab in San Antonio for 40 years, and he had made good money this way. Indeed, even when he started, in 1972, he was making $200 a day [hmmm, what would that be in 2012 dollars?].



Anyway, he has done well enough to send his son to college. The boy attended the University of Connecticut: in his second year there, he called his cabbie father to say, "They just invited me to join the fraternity! They don't treat me like a Mexican in Texas here. This place is great!"

So my cabbie friend was delighted to learn that his fare was from Connecticut. And, without any effort to draw any broad social lessons therefrom: I'm delighted to have that reminescence as a way of closing this little travelogue.

As to why I went to San Antonio and what I did there: that will make the gist of my next two entries. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak