Skip to main content

Islamic Finance -- a bit of history



So with my astonishment noted as yesterday., let me proceed on the subject of Islamic Finance. This is a set of practices (and accompanying theories) that have grown up to allow devout Muslims to make use of their savings, without keeping them in a mattress on the one hand and without committing the offense Muslims call riba on the other.

Riba is often understood to mean contracted-for rates of interest on debt in general.

How does finance work without interest? There are lots of ways to go about answering that question.

I've recently read a book by Muhammad Akram Khan entitled What is Wrong with Islamic Economics?   that holds among much else that rather too much ingenuity has been expended on trying to devise a system of finance without interest. The simple answer he prefers is that riba in the relevant sense is quite a narrow range of conduct, and completely distinct from the practice of charging for a borrower's access to investment capital.  Riba only means (according to Khan) the soiling of what ought to be a personal act of charity.

Khan criticizes other scholars for advocating a system "that does exactly what conventional banks are doing but in more inefficient and riskier ways," preserving the sense of piety of the advocates of such finance at the expense of that inefficiency and risk.

But none of that is why I'm writing this post. One bit of his book that especially intrigued me and that gave me a chance to introduce here an illustration of a catapult, was one of the end-notes to chapter 14. I'll quote most of the note: "Muslim scholars have not noticed the truce agreement signed by the Prophet with the people of Tai'f....Clause 9 of the agreement says: 'Any unsecured debt that has become due but the debtor is defaulting, interest will be payable, though Allah does not sanction its legality.' Clause 19 further elaborates: 'Any mortgaged debt on which interest has not yet been paid would be repaid without interest. However, the debtor would get extension till the end of Jamad al-Awwal, if he does not have means to pay. If he does not pay the debt in the extended period, interest will be payable on it."

The forces under the Prophet Muhammad besieged the city of T'aif in 630. The siege was unsuccessful -- the city walls held, despite an attack by catapults. But the city leadership was unhappy with the costly stalemate and entered into negotiations, and that led to the treaty described above.

I suppose Khan's point here is that the Prophet himself was willing to compromise with the paying of interest as a strategic decision, so the prohibition thereof was nothing unconditional/Absolute.

During the course of those negotiations, Muhammad refused another sort of compromise. The leaders of Taif had suggested they be allowed to worship their own goddess, Al-lat, for another three years, after which they would convert to Islam. This compromise was not acceptable: the only God must be worshipped, and worshipped exclusively, at once, though the 'no riba' rule could be phased in over time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...