Skip to main content

Turkey, Secularism, and the Price of Oil

Inflation Adjusted Crude Oil Price Chart

A few thoughts about Turkey.

The readers of this blog are a well-informed bunch, and I'm sure they know the basics. To wit: on May 31,  protests were underway (peacefully) in Istanbul, where the catalyzing issue was the government's plan to replace a historical park with a shopping mall. Police responded that day in a heavy-handed way, tear gas, water cannon, 63 arrests. This has led to a spreading of the protests and a wider range of grievances, while Prime Minister Tayyip Erdoğan has asserted that he has the high ground, and called the protestors "hoodlums."

This is clearly about a good deal more than a single land-use dispute.

It reminds me of something I wrote in my book, Gambling with Borrowed Chips. I sought to explain an upswing in crude oil prices that began in April 2007 and that continued until the summer of 2008.

The world price of crude is of course very sensitive to news about the politics of the middle east. In April 2007, when the upward move in question got underway, the president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said ... well, never mind that. Today's subject is Turkey.

By August 2007, the oil price may have been ready to settle down into a new equilibrium, except that it received another impetus on the up side. Voters in Turkey that month elected Abdullah Gül their new President. Gül remains in that post to this day and is, to put it roughly, Erdoğan's boss.

 Gül's election was note-worthy because he was the first devout Muslim ever to become president of  modern Turkey -- a country that since it came into being, in deliberate opposition to the ways of its Ottoman precursor state -- has had a decidedly secular political culture. This has allowed it to serve in many situations as a valuable bridge between the western and the Islamic worlds. 

Gül, and the uncertainties that this new leader, this new type of leader, might introduce into the region was surely on the minds of traders for the remainder of 2007, and the price of crude oil continued its rise. It didn't stabilize until the summer of 2008, when it briefly ascended above the $91 per barrel mark before heading back down. In inflation-adjusted 2013 numbers, that means it peaked at $134.38.

The chart above gives the history of petroleum prices since 1946 [in 2013 dollars on the red line, in nominal dollars on the black line.]  The sources is www.InflationData.com .

I draw your attention to the right hand side of the chart especially. You'll see that the red and black lines both peak in early 2008, and then precipitously decline. They recovered, reaching a lesser peak in 2010, and have since again declined somewhat.

My thesis: we are now, in Turkey, seeing the sort of event that Mr. Market was worried about in 2007-08. The actuality of what was then a dire possibility may well create another such spike.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak