Skip to main content

NML v. Argentina: Some Links





That graph comes from nine years ago, a Brad DeLong post on Argentina's interest rate spreads from four to six years before that. It's a neat reminder of how long the controversy over these bonds has been simmering along.


Here is the recent Supreme Court decision on the litigation/discovery question.


slip opinion


Noah Freeman, of Bloomberg, offers his opinion that the near-simultaneous decision of the Supreme Court to refuse to hear opinions on the merits of the lower court orders  is "legally surprising, financially worrisome, and internationally questionable."


Lyle Denniston of SCOTUSblog has this to say: No relief for Argentina.


JURIST of the Un. of Pittsburgh School of Law, offered a simple two-paragraph statement.


THE NEW YORK TIMES goes further, emphasizing for example the Republic of Argentina's statements that it would :"try to comply but that another default would be a possibility given the overall sums at stake for all holdout bondholders." Byline to Adam Liptak.


Here is Bloomberg News' full dossier on Paul Singer, the man behind NML.


Adam Levitin of the indispensable blog Credit Slips, discusses where matters might go from here.


He's working in part from language in the Prospectus Supplement, which you can read for yourself here. [Warning, it's 374 pages of legalese.]


The BBC has posted this.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…