Skip to main content

The Big Bang Theory

I'm thinking of the TV show now, not the actual theory.


One snippet of dialogue from an early episode sticks in my mind as a fine example of concise writing and character development.


In the character's world, they are fans of a reality teevee show about aspiring supermodels, and the various beautiful young women aspiring to that status all live together, "Big Brother" style, in a house in southern California.


One character, Howard, is determined that he will find the location of that house and visit the supermodels within the week.


The dialogue (I'm working from memory) goes something like this:


LEONARD: You'll never be able to get in there, Howard.


HOWARD: That's what they said to Neil Armstrong about getting on the moon.


SHELDON: No one said anything of the sort to Neil Armstrong. An entire nation spent a decade getting him there.


HOWARD: [Affecting a Kennedy accent]: Well, my fellow Americans, before this week is out, we will put a Wolowitz on one of America's supermodels.


RAJ: And thousands of people will believe it never happened.


By the way, I've since checked. IMDB has the exact transcript. And my memory was pretty good.


Click here


This snippet displays nicely the essence of each of the four central characters. Leonard is the skeptic of the group. Howard (until they remade him as a happily married man, and to some extent even after that) the combination of nerd and sleaze. Sheldon takes Howard's statement literally and, given that way of taking it, responds logically. Raj is a man of few words, but he makes them count when he does deliver them.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…