Skip to main content

NCIS and Hogan's Heroes

Image result for hogan's heroes cast

I saw a few minutes of an old NCIS episode recently, one of several episodes that turn on the interaction of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service with Israel's Mossad.

Why does a show that seems to have started off as a "CSI in uniform" idea go back to that well so often?

I was wondering about this, and suddenly thought about the '60s show, Hogan's Heroes.

That show was conceived during the worst of a long period of nuclear tension between US and USSR as competing hegemons, but it was about a period when the two nations were allies against a common foe. In HH, there was a recurring character -- Marya, a flirtatious Russian spy. The screenwriters treated her with ambivalence: you understood she was on the same side of the war as Hogan, whom she called "Dah-link," but she was also trouble and he was rightly wary of her.

The figures from Mossad who show up on NCIS are treated with that same sort of ambivalence. For very different reasons in terms of the broader politico-cultural context, but it ends up much the same on screen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…