Skip to main content

Wheels Off the Greek/EU Deal

Image result for greece wallpaper

The back-and-forth over whether Greece (1) wants to stay in the Eurozone, or (2) if it doesn't, whether it will be able to leave, and (3) if it does, whether it will be able to stay, continues, and indeed intensifies.

Back in April I wrote here:

The problem seems to be that there is no 'clean' way for Greece to leave the Eurozone. Bringing back the drachma would require at the least an extremely complicated period of transition, one with which the rest of Europe would have no incentive to co-operate.

So the Eurozone is like the roach motel of yore. Roaches check in, but they can't check out.

Yet there is no
a priori reason to believe that the single monetary policy maintained by the European Central Bank and related authorities is best for all the countries involved. So one might naturally hope that thought will be given to an orderly exit mechanism.


I still believe that statement, though brief and simplistic, is roughly speaking a sound one.

Part of what is new is additional evidence since late April that Greece does want to exit, insofar as one can speak of a collective entity such as a nation state 'wanting' anything.

Another bit of news is the existence of a Plan B that a small team of Greeks working for the finance department were writing even as I was writing those words, a blueprint for a re-creation of the old drachma.

Former finance minister Yanis Varoufakis admitted the existence of "Plan B," soon after he departed from that post  early last month. The admission came in a supposedly confidential (but recorded) interview. Of course, such confidences do have a way of leaking out, and the world started reading transcripts of Varoufakis' statements on Sunday, July 26th. The immediate reflex of much of Greek's officialdom was to deny the truth of these statements, in effect to call Varoufakis a liar.

Things have gone beyond that, though.

Click here: Tsipras defends Varoufakis.


Popular posts from this blog

Great Chain of Being

One of the points that Lovejoy makes in the book of that title I mentioned last week is the importance, in the Neo-Platonist conceptions and in the later development of the "chain of being" metaphor, of what he calls the principle of plenitude. This is the underlying notion that everything that can exist must exist, that creation would not be possible at all were it to leave gaps.

The value of this idea for a certain type of theodicy is clear enough.

This caused theological difficulties when these ideas were absorbed into Christianity.  I'll quote a bit of what Lovejoy has to say about those difficulties:

"For that conception, when taken over into Christianity, had to be accommodated to very different principles, drawn from other sources, which forbade its literal interpretation; to carry it through to what seemed to be its necessary implications was to be sure of falling into one theological pitfall or another."

The big pitfalls were: determinism on the on…

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…