Skip to main content

October 18, 2010

Deauville is located in Normandy

The Federal Lawyer will soon run a review of mine of GAME OVER, a memoiristic account of the crisis of Greek debt in the period 2009-2011, when the book's author, George Papaconstantinou, was finance minister.

I won't steal my own thunder by going over the material of that review here.

Instead, I'll simply mention this: my birthday plays a prominent part. Specifically, my 52d birthday -- October 18, 2010. So pardon me a flashback Friday.

In October 2010, French and German officials met each other in the seaside resort town of Deauville, in the Normandy region of France. They discussed Greece. The two countries involved in the summit were until that time taking somewhat different positions, but each wanted to present a common front. So, as Papaconstantinou (who wasn't there) reconstructs it --

On October 18th ... Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel -- both clad in raincoats -- went strolling on the famous Deauville promenade. In the culmination of months of behind-the-scenes negotiations, they sealed a deal that took even their closest aides by surprise.

He doesn't say that it was actually raining. We can take the raincoats as a clue, unless that is a European head-of-state sort of fashion statement. Anyway ...

Germany backed down on automatic sanctions for countries breaching fiscal rules and accepted 'qualified majority' decision making, which gave greater discretion to governments, something France badly wanted. In exchange France accepted a proposal for a limited EU treaty change that would, as of 2013, turn the temporary bail-out fund into a permanent mechanism. 

I'm not sure I know what all of that means, even having read the context. No wonder it didn't get into my review.  Still, something kind of important happened on October 18. That's all you need to know.


Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.

We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Cancer Breakthrough

Hopeful news in recent days about an old and dear desideratum: a cure for cancer. Or at least for a cancer, and a nasty one at that.

The news comes about because investors in GlaxoSmithKline are greedy for profits, and has already inspired a bit of deregulation to boot. 

The FDA has paved the road for a speedy review of a new BCMA drug for multiple myeloma, essentially cancer of the bone marrow. This means that the US govt has removed some of the hurdles that would otherwise (by decision of the same govt) face a company trying to proceed with these trials expeditiously. 

This has been done because the Phase I clinical trial results have been very promising. The report I've seen indicates that details of these results will be shared with the world on Dec. 11 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 

The European Medicines Agency has also given priority treatment to the drug in question. 

GSK's website identifies the drug at issue as "GSK2857916," althou…

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…