Skip to main content

Happy Bastille Day

Something French would seem to be called for today.

Also, I happen to have a thing about Broadway musicals.

Okay, so should I riff on Les Mis?

No, I think I'll go further back than that. In 1973, a production of Candide trod the boards. This of course was a work of satirical prose fiction by Voltaire, adapted for Broadway by Hugh Wheeler, with music by Leonard Bernstein and lyrics by Richard Wilbur and Stephen Sondheim.

I will quote some of those lyrics today, I trust within the limits of whatever counts as "fair use" of a 44 year old play.  I don't know how the whole notion of "intellectual property" is going to survive the case of the monkey selfie, though....

Anyway, the below is from what is known as the "Lesson Song." The character of Pangloss is introduced as the house intellectual of a patron's castle. When we first see him, he is giving a lesson on his Leibnizian theodicy.

PANGLOSS.
PRAY, CLASSIFY PIGEONS AND CAMELS.

PUPILS.
PIGEONS CAN FLY. 
CAMELS ARE MAMMALS.

PANGLOSS.
THERE IS A REASON
FOR EV’RYTHING UNDER THE SUN.

PUPILS.
THERE IS A REASON
FOR EV’RYTHING UNDER THE SUN.

MAXIMILIAN.
OBJECTION!
WHAT ABOUT SNAKES?

PANGLOSS.
SNAKES.
‘TWAS SNARE THAT TEMPTED MOTHER EVE. 
BECAUSE OF SNAKE WE NOW BELIEVE
THAT ‘THO’ DEPRAVED,
WE CAN BE SAVED
FROM HELL-FIRE AND DAMNATION.

PUPILS. 
BECAUSE OF SNAKE’S TEMPTATION.

PANGLOSS.
IF SNAKE HAD NOT SEDUCED OUR LOT,
AND PRIMED US FOR SALVATION,
JEHOVAH COULD NOT PARDON ALL
THE SINS THAT WE CALL CARDINAL,
INVOLVING BED AND BOTTLE
NOW ON TO ARISTOTLE.
MANKIND IS ONE.
ALL MEN ARE BROTHERS.

PUPILS.
AS YOU’D HAVE DONE,
DO UNTO OTHERS.

PANGLOSS.
IT’S UNDERSTOOD IN
THIS BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS.
PUPILS.
ALL IS FOR THE GOOD IN
THIS BEST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS.
----------------------------------------------------------

For the uninitiated, the musical (true to the Voltairean source) is ridiculing Pangloss. Voltaire's own message was that the world is often thoroughly lousy, and that Panglossian rationalization is an impediment to efforts to make it somewhat less lousy.

Happy Bastille Day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak