I discussed Quantum Bayesian theory here about three weeks ago. But now that I know what to look for, it has become easier to find more about it, so I come back to it.
Early this year, the William & Mary blog ran an interview with Hans Christian von Baeyer, who believes that QB-ism (which he pronounces "cubism" as in Picasso) is nothing less than the "future of physics." He regrets that advocates of QBism have yet to get it into physics textbooks. But there are "hundreds of articles and conference proceedings" that deal with it, so he is hoping admission into the canon, with the dozen or so older interpretations of quantum mechanics, will come soon.
Von Baeyer also makes reference to "an excellent article" that was added to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy in December 2016. So, after finishing up the interview, I went there. The actual title of that article is evidence that this is an appropriate thing to be discussing in a blog named for William James' philosophy. For the article in the SEP is: "Quantum-Bayesian and Pragmatist Views of Quantum Theory."
Richard Healey of the University of Arizona is credited with authorship of this article. If I understand it (a big "if,") Healey breaks interpretations of quantum theory down into three broad camps: the ontic, the epistemic, and the pragmatic. The "ontic" say that the formulas of a quantum state describe physical reality. The "epistemic" say that the formulas describe "an agent's incomplete information about an underlying ontic state." The "pragmatic" physicists refuse to take sides in THAT divide, because they believe that humans are part of the underlying reality, that the know-er and the known are enmeshed. Bayesianism is one of the pragmatic views.
QBism does indeed have deep Jamesian roots. I write about them here https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.2141.pdf, here https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.03483.pdf, and most extensively here https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.2390.pdf. --- Chris Fuchs
ReplyDeleteGood thing to hear from you, Dr Fuchs. I'm curious how you discovered my humble blog and this six month old entry. (Thanks for the links.)
DeleteI'm not sure. I think I was searching for whether the Japanese, Chinese, and Korean translations of Hans von Baeyer's book (QBism: The Future of Quantum Physics) had appeared in print yet ... and Google led me here instead.
ReplyDeleteWell since you came, I'd like to tell you that this is far from the only mention I've made of QB, although for a time I was calling it "Bayesian Quantum" theory instead. BQ? How would THAT be pronounced? "Burke"? Here are a couple of links you might want to check out at your convenience. http://jamesian58.blogspot.com/2017/10/bayesian-quantum-theory-i.html http://jamesian58.blogspot.com/2017/10/bayesian-quantum-theory-ii.html
DeleteEnjoy!