Skip to main content

What He Would Have Wanted If...

Image result for surgical table

"[A] wounded and unconscious victim of an accident may not take the decisions about what is to be done to him, but in so far as the doctor chooses a course which the doctor knows the patient would have preferred had he been conscious, there is no violation of the patient's freedom -- indeed, there is an affirmation of that freedom in the sense of 'effective power', if the doctor's choice is guided by what the patient would have wanted." A. Sen, THE IDEA OF JUSTICE (2009).

For the bibliographically inclined, that's at p. 302, in chapter fourteen, "Equality and Liberty."

Yes. I see the point, but it is bothersome.

We might want to say, intuitively, that I am acting freely if a surrogate of mine (a chosen surrogate ideally) makes the decision I would have made in a time of medical crisis, when I could not have made it. In contrast, I am not free if the decision is made for me by someone who doesn't care what I would have wanted.

For example, perhaps two operations are possible as means to save my life. We'll just cal them A and B.

Operation A has an 80% chance of success. We'll assume "success" here is binary -- either I'll recover or I'll die on the table.

Operation B has a 65% chance of success.

BUT ... Operation A will leave me blind. Operation B, if it is successful, will end not just in my recuperation, but in my sighted recuperation.

So the question I or some surrogate must face is: what value in terms of success likelihood to I assign to the prospect of post-operative vision?

There is of necessity a subjective element here. The prospect of blindness may be more terrifying to me, dear reader, than to some of you. I might thus be more inclined to opt for Operation B.

Is it fair to say in that context that arrangements for surrogates who know or at least who care about my own subjective preferences makes me more free, more a liberty-possessing creature, than I would be at that time? And that this is a good reason, perhaps even the decisive reason, in favor of such arrangements?

I think the answer is "yes," here and that this is what Sen was getting at in that passage. But the situation is logically troubling. Because every pinhead dictator thinks he is a wise compassionate doctor and the unconscious body politics lies before him ready to receive and be made more free by the benefits of his benevolence....

The next two posts will also be inspired by Amartya Sen although by a someone different aspect of his work.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more