Skip to main content

Top Financial Stories 2017

Image result for martyrs Allah


At this time of year I ask myself what were the biggest stories of the past twelve months in business/financial news. 

Of course, I choose the ones I do largely because they illustrate an important theme, and in the list below I'll spell out and boldface the theme. Yet the theme itself isn't the story.

Here are the twelve stories, by month, that especially caught my attention and that in retrospect I recommend to yours. 

1. January. Immigration. Well, of course. But I want to highlight a different aspect of the immigration question than the one that has caught the most attention. In the early days of the new year, Reuters appears to have heard from sources that the President elect (as he then was) was in talks with hi-tech employers about the possible overhaul of the H1B visa system. At the end of the month, word leaks out that the now President, Donald Trump, is moving in the opposite direction from what those employers presumably had hoped. This will be very clear by March.

2. February. Economics of crude oil. The future, if any, of the DAPL in the US is a hotly contested issue -- among other places, in Vatican City. By month's end, though, it does appear that the pipeline will be completed.

3. March.  Brexit. Prime Minister Theresa May formally initiates the process of the UK's withdrawal from the European Union. The debate in the UK is now over "hard" versus "soft" versions of Brexit, both versus a Goldilocks "just right" Brexit that everyone wants to promise.

4.  April. Economics of coal. In a surprise move representing the influence of climate change concerns, most of the energy utilities in Europe agree that they will phase out the use of coal, bringing no new coal-fired plants on line after 2020. [On June 1, the US President would dramatically announce a withdrawal of the US from the Paris Accord, in keeping with his own pro-coal campaign of last year.]

5. May. The Rise of China. The People's Republic of China moves on both the fiscal and the diplomatic fronts to advance the cause of an updated Silk Road, tying its commerce to that of the Middle East and Europe.

6. June. Law & Economics of pharmacology.  On June 12 the US Supreme Court allows Novartis to sell a copycat version of an Amgen product in move that may enhance competition in a wide range of medicines.

7. July. Sukuk (Shariah compliant bonds) controversy.  Dana Gas, of the UAE, is trying to get away with declaring sukuk bonds invalid. London court issues a split ruling on some preliminary matters, will hold a full hearing in September. The battle would drag on until November, and Dana Gas would eventually lose.

8. August. Ecology & Policy. President Temer's critics in Brazil have long contended that he has put Amazonia up for sale to the cattle and agricultural interests. Now they may add the mining and minerals interests to those of his corruptors. Temer issued a decree abolishing an ecological preserve, Renca.

9. September. Law & Economics of health insurance.The Republicans in Congress, with the (intermittent) assistance of the Republican President, tried and failed repeatedly in July to keep a campaign pledge and repeal Obamacare. They left the issue to lie fallow through August, then gave it a final 'college try' in September. To no avail.  As of this writing, Obamacare remains the law of the land.

10 October. Terrorism and its financiers. The US Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Jesner v. Arab Bank. Involves the use by private parties of a very old US statute to bring a lawsuit against an institution allegedly funneling payments to the families of "martyrs" who have blown themselves up in Allah's cause. Of course the martyrs take others (including kinfolk of the plaintiffs) with them.

11. November. Artificial Intelligence. Samsung, the Korean electronics giant, announced the creation of an AI research center, part of its restructuring to "quickly respond to market changes."

12.  December. Tax law enforcement. Yes, I know that a big new bill became law this month. But I have my mind on something else here. Tax enforcement. The US Supreme Court hears arguments in a case that may draw limits to prosecutions of the felony of obstructing the administration of the tax code. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak