Skip to main content

Judith Butler and a Petition I

JudithButler2013.jpg


Apparently members of the Modern Language Association have initiated a petition to remove Judith Butler as that organization's Vice President and President elect.

In order to understand this petition, one has to have some answer to each of the following questions:

1) Who is Judith Butler and how important is she?
2) What is the MLA and how important is it?
3) What are the grounds/merits of this complaint?

I will address the first two of those questions today and the final one tomorrow.

Judith Butler is a philosophy professor at UCal Berkeley. She is the author of Gender Troubles (1990) and Bodies that Matter (1993). Her writing style is notoriously difficult.  Here is one sentence often quoted as an example of the impenetrability of it: "The move from a structuralist account in which capital is understood to structure social relations in relatively homologous ways to a view of hegemony in which power relations are subject to repetition, convergence, and rearticulation brought the question of temporality into the thinking of structure, and marked a shift from a form of Althusserian theory that takes structural totalities as theoretical objects to one in which the insights into the contingent possibility of structure inaugurate a renewed conception of hegemony as bound up with the contingent sites and strategies of the rearticulation of power." 

No, it doesn't get much clearer "in context." 

Nonetheless, Butler is of considerable weight in academia today. Weighty enough that Martha Nussbaum has invoked her as a case study of much that is wrong with US intellectual life, especially the "mystification" and "hierarchy" that Nussbaum sees as the key to Butler's body of written work.

What is the MLA? 

It has been around since the 1880s, originally as a discussion and study group. With the passage of time comes venerability, almost by definition. And for the MLA, the passage of four thirds of a century has brought with it surprising prominence. The MLA has become the publisher of a widely-followed style manual, and the host of an annual convention that is the largest scholarly gathering in the humanities. 

So a petition to dislodge Professor Butler from her position of prominence with the MLA is kind of a big deal. 

More tomorrow. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak