Skip to main content

Whitey Bulger RIP



Whitey Bulger died on October 30, 2018, bringing us all a spate of stories reminding us of his notoriety, five years after his conviction, just as he had begun to be forgotten -- as the passage of time had consigned him to the role of just another nameless inmate in vastness of the US prison system.

Bulger's case is worth remembering, because it may remind us how regularly government is the cause or at the very least the partner of the woes from which it poses as our protector.

Bulger, the brother of the influential Massachusetts politico William Bulger (who was at his own career peak President of the state Senate), became notorious as the head of the feared Winter Hill Gang in Boston through the '80s. How did he become that? Because in February 1979 federal prosecutors indicted various members of that Gang, including its boss Howie Winter, having noticed that they were fixing horse races. Bulger and his bud Stephen Flemmi were originally going to be named in the indictment, but at the last minute the prosecutor decided to drop the charges against those two, naming them instead as unindicted co-conspirators.

The apparent reason for this was that Bulger and Flemmi were valuable as informants. In effect, they had become the government licensed gangsters.  They took over the remnants of the Winter Hill Gang and by selective tips to their FBI buddies, eliminated competition.

When, many years later, the Boston State Police finally initiated a serious investigation into a string of murders committed by the new and improved Winter Hill gang, they deliberately kept the FBI out of it, having come to understand that what they told the FBI would get back to Bulger.

John Connolly, who had long been Bulger's FBI "handler," was himself indicted in 1999 for a variety of racketeering-related offenses, and was convicted in 2008.

There is much more, none of it inspirational for those who believe that a State is legitimate so long as it is a "nightwatchman" State. Whitey and William Bulger were NOT in distinct lines of work.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more