Skip to main content

A Memory from 1963

Image result for Kennedy

The death of President Kennedy is the first 'public' fact of which I have some memory. I had just turned five at the time (a little more than a month before). I have some earlier personal memories, including a happy one of playing around on a dumpster outside our family home -- then an apartment building in East Hartford. The big green dumpster was a blast. My big brother and I crawled around on it like it was a jungle gym.

But by 1963 we have moved into a nice ranch style house in Enfield, with an actual backyard, and our own trash cans. No shared dumpster.

Dad was working second shift at the time. He could now afford to commute to and from work from a suburb a fair distance to the north of East Hartford (he had moved us to the apartment at a time when it was necessary for him to walk to and from work there.) To be precise, he could afford to become a member of a five-man car pool that did so. He thus used his own car only once a week, leaving it with Mom the other days. And of course he could afford to make mortgage payments on the new home. Good times. Socio-economic ladder climbing was not a matter on which my 5-year-old self had any grasp, but Dad was doing a good job of it.

And around noon on a certain day on November 1963 Jim Faille was out in the back yard with his son Christopher, introducing me to a football and  the notion of trying to catch something thrown at me (rather than, say, running away from it as it approaches). He would probably have had a suit and tie on (I say, reconstructing a bit) because he would have been waiting for his carpool buddy to come by and honk the horn.

The project of creating the next Johnny Unitas from out of the fold of the Faille family was not going to get far. But I was having some one-on-one time with Dad, so all was good. My older brother (the one I had shared the dumpster games with) was in a first grade classroom. My younger brother was in the house with Mom, as was my 1 and 1/2 year old baby sister.

Then Mom stuck her head out of the window and said "Jim, you've got to come in here." Dad looked in her direction silently for a moment, and she managed to say something like "something on teevee" in a strangled voice. He went in. My play-time with Dad for the day was done.

Again: the larger significance of the day was lost on me. It stuck in my mind chiefly because I had never heard that desperately worried tone in Mom's voice before, and seldom would again. Only years later did I connect this interruption of my football lesson with History.

So that is my story, one that occurs to me now only because yet another football season is drawing to a close.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak