Skip to main content

Biggest Events of the Millennium

Image result for Saddam Hussein

Someone on a social media site recently challenged me to produce a short list of the biggest historical events since 2000. 

I took her to mean "since 2000 inclusive." And to keep the list respectably short, I've limited myself to one Big Event from each year. 

After a little thought, I came up with the following, which as you can see I'm reproducing here. I considered invoking an event in the world of baseball for the Big Event of 2004, but thought better of it. (New Englanders will know what I had in mind.) 


2000: The world is devastated on January 1st by the consequences of the Y2K bug ... uh, never mind. The refutation "ambulando" of the Y2K doomsayers serves as evidence that the digital world is more resilient than it had been in the fears of some and the (semi-secret) hopes of other. 
2001: Al Qaeda attacks US targets in Virginia and New York, kills thousands.
2002: The new “euro” notes and coins are introduced as circulating currency in much of Europe.
2003: The overthrow of Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq.
2004: Ten new countries join the EU in the largest expansion in the Union's history, creating the globe's largest free trade zone. 
2005: Angela Merkel assumes office as the Chancellor of Germany.
2006: Google bought YouTube for what seemed a massive amount of money $1.65 billion. (Given the subsequent growth of video streaming, that number nowadays looks reasonable.)
2007: Apple brings out the first iPhone. Until this point, Blackberry, aka Research in Motion, dominated the smart phone market. That would not long remain the case.
2008: Huge New York financial institutions fail, esp Bear Stearns in the spring, Lehman Brothers in September, as the value of whole classes of real estate derivatives disappears.
2009: In June of this year, Bernie Madoff is sentenced to 150 years in prison for running an epic ponzi scheme.
2010: An explosion on the Deep Horizon platform in the Gulf of Mexico results in an unprecedentedly voluminous spill of crude oil into ocean water.
2011: A revolution in Libya, with outside assistance, topples the government of Muammar Gaddafi. Gaddafi himself is killed in October.
2012: Militant groups in Libya attack a US consulate in Benghazi. A US ambassador and three other Americans die in the attack. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will receive a good deal of opprobrium in connection with these deaths, which may be what has kept her from the Oval Office.
2013: In an ever-morphing Eurozone debt crisis, the EC warns Spain and Italy that their budgets have gotten way out of line; austerity is required.
2014: Scotland votes to remain part of the UK.
2015: Iran reaches an agreement with several world powers that had sanctioned it over its nuclear program.
2016: UK votes to leave the EU, that is, to “Brexit.”
2017: The People's Republic of China moves on both the fiscal and the diplomatic fronts to advance the cause of an updated Silk Road, tying its commerce to that of the Middle East and East Africa.
2018: The United States takes hemp, and CBD oil derived from hemp, off of its "Schedule I," the list of drugs supposedly void of any legitimate medicinal use. This happens without a lot of fanfare and pursuant to a Farm Bill. May be a turning-of-the-tide moment. 

NB: In my month by month list of big finance industry events this past year, I neglected even to mention the de-scheduling of hemp. So I've covered my bets a bit by invoking it here! If I had to reconcile the two lists, I could of course say that the legalization of hemp this year was not a "financial" story in the sense I had in mind in composing the previous list. But the issue of how one would define the phrase so as to make that distinction work is an intricate one, and not at all worth a lot of time. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak