Skip to main content

Goldfinger

Image result for Goldfinger

In the Ian Fleming novel Goldfinger (let's forget about the Hollywood treatment for now), there is a remarkable moment involving M, James Bond's boss.

This novel was published, let's remember, in 1959, during the heyday of the Bretton Woods system of international monetary affairs. There were strict rules in the UK, pursuant to the Bretton Woods agreement, about when gold could be taken out of Britain. Saying, "But I own this gold! I should be able to taken it on the cross-channel ferry with me if I want and sell it to the first Frenchman I met on the other side!" was not  a defense, it was a confession. The Kingdom had a claim to that gold too, and if you as a subject of Her Majesty owned any gold you owned it, as a private person, only subject to that claim.

The passage I want to quote today is in an early expository bit of the novel. Bond and M are both recipients of a lecture from an official of the Bank of England, who explains to them what nasty stuff Goldfinger is up to and how he must be stopped. His now foreign gold must be repatriated.

The lecture is delivered by Colonel Smithers who, Fleming tells us, looks just as one would expect a "Colonel Smithers" to look. 'Nuff said.

Later M says to Bond, "Personally I should have thought the strength of the pound depends on how hard we all worked rather than how much gold we've got. However, that's probably too easy an answer for the politicians, or more likely too difficult."

Intriguing: M is inclined to side with Goldfinger on the merits of the underlying dispute, but he is a faithful servant of Her Majesty, and of the politicians who are working in her name, so he gives Bond the order to stop Goldfinger. The fellow does turn out to be a nasty piece of work as the plot unfolds, but still .... this early expository material fascinates me.

Lots of things might be said about this as a way of setting up the plot. I'll just leave them unsaid because I'm feeling lazy.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more