Skip to main content

The Substance of Style, Part II



Continuing our look at Postrel's book THE SUBSTANCE OF STYLE.

There is a theory known to undergraduate psychology students as the "hierarchy of needs."

It is the notion, associated with the psychologist Abraham Maslow, who formulated it in the middle of the last century, that the lower level needs must be satisfied before one's attention turns to the level of needs next up. One secures a place to defecate before one even goes looking for food. One has to have a certain level of material comfort, including at least a diminution of hunger pangs, before one moves on to looking for a mate, developing friendships, joining clubs, etc. And so forth upwards to such lofty goals as self-actualization and "transcendence."

At first glance, one might take some of what Postrel says as in accord with this notion. After all, the "aesthetic age" upon which we have entered seems to be a matter of concern chiefly with the wealthier nations, nations where relatively few people don't know where their next meal is coming from. Perhaps the industrialized world is entering an aesthetic age because it has moved a bit up the hierarchy, collectively if not merely in the case of the least well off.

But no ... Postrel is not Maslovian. It is NOT true that we have a meta-need to deal with more fundamental needs before we can or should turn to the making-special of our lived environments. Rather, "Poor people built the cathedrals of Europe and developed the sand castles of Tibet. Poor people turned baskets and pottery into decorative art." etc.

The move into what is called "modernist" architecture, which involved a spurning of aesthetic matters, a functionality-is-all dogma, did not come about as a matter of poverty There was an element of fashion to it. It was an aesthetic reaction against the aesthetic, so to speak. And since then, pomo architecture has moved back toward the embrace of style and stylishness, in ways that annoy some, delight others, and comfort a third group. Maslow' theory doesn't work as a basis for developmental sequence.

Nonetheless, I have illustrated this post with one graphic illustration of the hierarchy of needs. Just because I can.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak