Skip to main content

Texas: Refreshments While In Line to Vote?

 


During all the heated debate about the Texas "election integrity" bill, I asked what seemed to me a simple question in a tweet. I asked if the Texas law had a no-food-or-water clause analogous to that in Georgia, passed into law earlier this year. 

I hadn't located the actual bill text yet when I asked. It turns out I had to find it for myself -- nobody on twitter was at all helpful. Here is the link: 

Bill Text: TX SB7 | 2021-2022 | 87th Legislature | Introduced | LegiScan

And the answer, at a quick scan, is "no." There is no analogous clause. 

But, to get back to my story: I asked this question on twitter and received only one reply (no answer). The reply wondered why I hadn't said "New York" instead of "Georgia" for purpose of comparison. After all, New York has the "same" rules. 

A little research indicates further: no, New York does not have the same rules. It has some similar rules, which seem to have been in place for years and which have gone unenforced. Some apologists for the Georgia rules seems to have researched and to have found a "liberal state" with food-and-drink-in-line restrictions. New York was "it." 

For the record, Georgia's rules are more draconian, and were surely not modeled after New York's, although the apologists press even that claim when they think the market will bear it.

At least in Texas (where the heat is a "dry heat," as opposed to humid Georgia) you'll still be able to bring your friend a glass of water to remedy that aridity while he waits in line.  


 

Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryJune 18, 2021 at 1:15 PM

    Bringing up New York is analogous to the way that Trump supporters defended Trump's kidnapping migrants' children and babies by falsely claiming that Obama had done the same. They are apparently unaware that, even if a precedent for an evil act exists (and one always does somewhere), such a precedent does not justify doing the evil act now.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more