Skip to main content

This "afraid of the truth" stuff? Meh

 




Democrats in Congress are saying that Republicans are giving them a hard time over the creation of a "Jan. 6 committee" because they are "afraid of the truth." 

I carry no water for the Republicans of today, but I have to say, THAT way of putting the problem is a little ... meh. 

The kind of August Commission and Big Thick Book of conclusions that the Dems have in mind here isn't meant to set out The Truth. It is meant to present an official version thereof. Consider the Warren Commission, by way of example. Even people who believe that Oswald killed Kennedy and did so acting alone will likely tell you the Warren Commission's connection with truth was, at best, casual. Johnson believed that the country needed a soothing tale. He tapped Earl Warren, who agreed to provide a soothing tale. If they did stumble upon the truth, the fact is a coincidence. 

And the problem with Republicans today isn't that they are afraid of The Truth. It is that they are afraid of demographics.  

What is more: I am nearly convinced (though I am open to dissuasion) of the view that the Republican Party is on its last legs. Against the usual off-year election trends, they are likely to be creamed in 2022, in part because of those demographics but in larger part because many voters they could reach in other circumstances are rather tired of the madman living on a golf course and demanding their fealty. 

People have been talking of late about the death of the Whig Party. I don't think that is apt. Let us go back before that -- even before the birth of the Whig Party -- for an analogy. We are seeing the death of the Federalist Party again. The Federalist Party, in its death, left no heir. So the Democrats became the only national party of importance for a period that was called the "era of good feelings." Nobody's feelings about that were good, and in due course the Dem coalition broke apart, Webster going one way and Calhoun going the other.

The Whigs, in short, were born after the "good feelings" had raged for a few election cycles. They picked up support from remnants of the old Federalists.  

A sane center-right party will eventually come about in the US again. It will come about as the Sanders-Manchin off-couple coalition of todays' Dems fades. Some will go one way, some the other. 

Let us hope we can get through all this, this time, without some of the nasty stuff in the last era of good feelings. The whole thing about Canadian soldiers burning the capital to the ground? Let's skip that, okay? 

Thinking in these terms, the thought of a Commission leaves me untouched.  


Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 6, 2022 at 8:21 PM

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more