Skip to main content

Greenwashing and Nikola




In another world this would be a very big story now. In this world, too much else seems to be going on and the Nikola trial has been thrown into obscurity. Even in the world of trial reporting -- Alex Jones was big, a document thief who lives in a golf club is big, Harvey Weinstein is big. The trial of Trevor Milton, the former CEO of Nikola, has been lost. 

There can't be more than three trials-of-the-century underway at any one time. 

But let's get into this. The title of the company is meant to honor Nikola Tesla and, if you are a cynic, you might suppose it was invented to suggest (without asserting) some sort of connection with the Elon Musk entity Tesla. There is no such connection, though. 

Nikola (like Tesla) manufactured electric cars and trucks. In mid 2020 Nikola was flying high. Its stock was worth $65. By July 2021, though, shares were down to around $12 and the CEO, Trevor Milton, was indicted for "lying about nearly all aspects of the business" to attract suckers ... um ... investors. 

Milton's trial wrapped up last week. The jury began and completed deliberations Friday. It found Milton guilty. 

Specifically, it brought in a guilty verdict on three of the four charges against him.  He was charged with two counts of wire fraud and two of securities fraud. He was acquitted of ONE of the securities fraud counts both of those on wire fraud.

My view? He is probably guilty, and his guilt is of a very general sort. There are a sufficient number of investors today who want to put their money into green ventures, "sustainable capitalism," that it is very tempting for an entrepreneur with a streak of fraudster in him to decide that he is going to sell whatever it is he needs to sell on the theory that it is exactly that. 

The product in question isn't really green. It was merely "washed" in green for the sake of the sale.


 



Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltOctober 20, 2022 at 4:25 AM

    I stand on a previous assertion regarding excess, extremism and exaggeration, lobbied in a comment on another blog post. Your statement about three trials of the century is spot on. Someone is always trying to sell something---even when it turns out they have nothing to sell. My deepest thanks to Dr. Matthias in San Francisco for his kind response.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more