Skip to main content

Lara Logan


Lara Logan is in the news again. 

In the early years of this millennium, LL seemed to be on a path to a great career as a television journalist. She was with CBS, for gawd's sake. Its news division has given the world Murrow and Cronkite. It is presumably where a young woman or man with ambitions in that line wants to be.

In 2011, as the Mubarak government collapsed in Egypt, as crowds filled up the streets of Cairo, CBS sent Logan and a camera crew to cover this huge story for them.   

This is where our story turns ugly.  Soon after Mubarak's resignation, Logan was raped by a rowdy celebratory crowd that may have included up to 300 men. She was rescued by soldiers and flown home where she was hospitalized for four days. 

On a message board to which I was contributing with some regularity at the time, I remember one commenter saying that he disagreed with news coverage of the attack. He thought the mainstream media ought to shut up about Logan. said he thought it was a tradition that reporters aren't the subject of stories, that the tradition was here being violated without good cause, and so forth. 

I got into some back-and-forth with him about this, in which I explained that although it would be considered inappropriate for Logan herself to do a stand-up piece on CBS News about the attack on her (and in fact that Dan Rather had said nothing on air about the notorious and much less serious what-s-the-frequency attack on him in 1986) there is no "tradition" that "the press" as a whole should ignore violence against reporters, sexual or otherwise. REM would not have titled that song after an incident that had remained uncovered and obscure. 

Anyway: after her assault. Logan's career really went off the rails. She was fired from CBS in 2013 after a report of hers (on an obscure platform known as 60 Minutes) with regard to the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya, turned out to be riddled with errors. She admitted the errors, and blamed them on the manager of the local guard force, Dylan Davies, who she alleged fed her the falsehoods. That of course was a poor excuse. Did she think the subject matter somehow deserved a story based on one unconfirmed source?   

Logan has been more outspokenly rightward ever since, and in her latest iteration she has gotten fired from NewsMax for going too far. NewsMax. The network run by people who had all been fired from Fox News for going too far. 

I won't get into the particulars of the latest Logan story. I'll just say: I hope she gets some good professional help. I suspect she is still processing the 2011 trauma. But that is my personal uninformed guess. I am much more certain that she could use some time away from the public eye.  


   


Comments

  1. I agree. Media work has risks that most of us don't think of---a decidedly dark side.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak