Intentional Causation

Mario de Caro and Matteo Grasso together wrote "Three Views of Downward Causation" for publication

in the 2017 anthology,

"Philosophical and scientific perspectives on downward causation." Nothing much to do with the

Koestler book, but I like that cover image.

The issue of "downward causation" is one that arises in the philosophy

of mind, among those who believe that mind and body, even mind and brain,

are different facts in the world, neither reducible to the other.

The issue of downward causation is: how if at all can mental events

cause physical events? How does my phenomenal desire that my arm move

lead to my arm moving?

De Caro and Grasso contend that naturalism is consistent with the reality

of downward causation. We do not have to postulate any non-natural

facts, souls, trans-empirical egos, a ghost in the machine, etc., in order to acknowledge that the

desire is a non-physical fact and that it CAUSES the arm movement.

They offer three possible explanations of how: anomalous monism,

ontological emergentism, and intentional causation. My readers will by

now remember that I have set out my own emergentist views here, at least

in broad outline. But De Caro and Grasso think intentional causation

is the best of the three candidates. What they mean by this door number

three is the idea that explanation and causation are mutually exclusive

and irreducible goals, and that intention can be part of the cause-and-effect

chain even if we learn how to omit it from any explanation.

It sounds like word-shuffling to me. No real help at all. But consider

this simply a bibliographic note.

Comments

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge. We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave. First, Plato is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability. I only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable a...

Jamesian Philosophy Refreshed

Search This Blog