Lichtman set aside: the election last week would seem to establish that the "neoconservative" movement is, politically, a spent force.
"Neocons" were the dominant public policy intellectuals of the Bush era in the history of the Republican Party.
The Harris campaign spent a lot of time and effort to reach out to Neocons, and to politicians associated with Neocons ideas, notably the Cheney family. It created a strikingly broad alliance with Neocons and Bernie Sanders under the same political roof.
It did Harris no good. Indeed, I suspect the rightward stretch of it was a misdirection that did her cause harm. Because the Cheneys speak only for themselves. Heck even if "W" himself had come out with a rousing endorsement of the Vice President, (which never happened) the result would likely have been spot on the same.
Such Neocons as are still active are just a coterie of mutual praise.
It is possible they never really were anything more: a Potemkin Village in political terms even when they occupied corridors of power.
The accompanying photo, by the way, is of Alexandria, in Egypt. I 'm showing you that for .... no good reason at all, except that I mentioned Alexandria a couple of days ago and didn't show it to you then.
One more brief election related comment tomorrow....
Trump is the new neocon, except that "con" now refers to conman and convicted criminal.
ReplyDelete