Skip to main content

Carbon Infrastructure Partners


 Roughly five years ago an energy-themed  private equity fund named JOG Capital changed its name to Carbon Infrastructure Partners, because the change reflected its new emphasis. 

I wrote about this at the time, and happening across my old piece in some recent web-surfing, I wondered how the subsequent years have treated them. 

Their website is here: https://carboninfrastructurepartners.com/about/ -- you will find there a brief account of their own transition from JOG.  You won't find out what JOG originally stood for -- perhaps founders' initials played a role. It is not important. 

What is important is that CIP describes itself as investing in companies with find creative ways to remove, reduce or avoid CO2 emissions.  If THIS is profitable there is hope for a sustainable capitalism.  So: is it? 

Unfortunately, we don't have good public data on this yet. CIP closed on its first fund of the new post-JOG era, CIP Energy Fund I, in 2022. [By "closure" I mean the moment when a fund's managers say "our tanks are full, no more investment thanks.] Specific performance metrics remain private.  But CIP has said that it is "on track" to deliver the targeted net internal rate of return [IRR] of between 10 and 14 percent. 

What is IRR? It is a calculation that factors in the exact timing of returns while allowing for some lock-up o principal.  [This sort of thing is for institutional investors with long horizons.] So what they are saying is that the net effect of their current and expected cash flows will have an end result for such investors equivalent to having earned at least 10 percent a year compounded, although ACTUAL cash returns may be lumpy or delayed.

The bottom line as I see it?  CIP is probably doing well enough to keep hope alive. 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...