Skip to main content

LewRockwell: Please Stop Running Fred Reed's Silly Stuff

LRC Article Demonstrates Why the Liberty Movement Has a Women Problem

I'm an anarcho-cap, not a "libertarian" in the usual sense of the term (that is, not a minarchist).  But I sympathize with the libertarians, I was active in the LP myself for a time, and I would like to see them prosper.

One of the online journals of opinion that does some good toward that end is LewRockwell.com. It proudly describes itself as "anti-state, anti-war, pro-market." Bravo on all three counts.

But I do wish they would stop running pieces by wolves in sheep's clothing, by social conservatives like the imbecile Fred Reed.

Here's a further explanation of why.

 


Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryAugust 17, 2013 at 4:27 AM

    Christopher,

    I have been aware for years that you consider yourself an anarcho-capitalist, but it only now occurred to me that the term is redundant, isn't it? An "anarcho-socialist" would be an oxymoron, wouldn't it? It seems that adding "capitalist" to "anarcho" conveys only that your belief in the free market is an important reason for your being an anarchist. An anarchist who was particularly concerned about freedom of speech might call himself an "anarcho-free speech advocate." And, just as an anarcho-capitalist would have to explain how to limit capitalism without government when necessary, an anarcho-free speech advocate would have to explain how to limit speech without government when necessary. (Preventing fraud would be an example of when it is necessary to limit both capitalism and speech.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. ChristopherAugust 17, 2013 at 7:30 AM

    Henry,

    What the "capitalist" adds on its side of the hyphen is my conviction that the disappearance of the state will not cause a disappearance of the institution of private property. If I believed that private property and the state necessarily fall together, and I wanted that end, I might well call myself an anarcho-communist. Think of Bakunin/Kropotkin.

    You might say that since the difference between anarcho-cap and anarcho-comm is simply a matter of prediction, we should work together with our comrade anarchists and perhaps delete the right hand side of the hyphen in either case and just be anarchists. Then when we achieve our goal of zapping the state, it will be time enough to see whether property flourishes or disappears.

    That is an appealing notion. But the two groups do have rather a different tempermental tone and each is inclined to claim that the other's anarchistic credentials are out of order. We are unlikely to be of much help to one another.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more