Skip to main content

Italy and the Eurozone

Image result for Italy

Italy recently (December 4) voted against certain constitutional changes in a referendum. This is thought to have great repercussions for the Eurozone, the group of countries sharing a common currency and a central bank.

Marine Le Pen, the leader of a right-wing nationalist party in France, has tweeted thus (I rely on the BBC's translation): "The Italians have disavowed the EU and Renzi. We must listen to this thirst for freedom of nations."

The reference there was to Italy's prime minister, Matteo Renzi, who announced his resignation the day after the vote.

So, what were the key constitutional provisions involved? First, the role of the Senate was to be reduced, making the Chamber of Deputies the supreme legislative body. Second, the role of the regions of the country in national legislation was to be eliminated. Under the existing constitutions, the nation state and the regions have "concurrent competence" in some matters.Essentially this has allowed for region-by-region nullification of affected laws. That was to end.

Finally, the CNEL (a consultative body of economists, lawyers, and labor union representatives created in 1958) was to be abolished.

None of this has happened. The people voted "no," by a 60/40 split.

Why do the particulars of Italy's constitution matter outside of Italy? Well, first, there is the figure of Renzi himself, who was highly regarded by the other heads of state in Europe, and whose disappearance from the scene leaves them, naturally, wondering both who and what come next.

Second, and related, the reason Renzi asked for those changes was his own pro-Europe political premise. The changes would have made it easier for him to push through legislation that would bring Italy in accord with what the rest of the Eurozone wants, even when that means budgetary austerity.

Finally, (a more specific concern within that one, if you will) there are the banks. Italy's banking sector is a shambles. Both the rest of Europe and the Renzi government has an ambitious program for re-structuring the industry: that won't happen now, at least not for some time, while the shaken-up politics of the country play themselves out.  And that not happening could have broader consequences.

Polls show a majority of Italians supporting continued membership in the Eurozone. Nonetheless, various dominoes are falling and its easy to imagine the line continuing. The parties who pressed for a "no" vote may now turn to making the case that a return of the lira is the best way to address Italy's economic problems, inclusive of those of its banks.

I quoted Le Pen's tweet above. Here's a tweet on the same subject from a very different source, US Keynesian economist Paul Krugman. 
 
"Hoo boy. Time to game out possible euro crises. https://t.co/4PhHPI8i5Y"
 
Indeed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…