Skip to main content

Susan Blackmore on Consciousness

Image result for Susan Blackmore

Susan Blackmore has written Consciousness: A Brief Insight. 

To reward her for that, I've posted her photo here.

She's described on the back cover as a "psychologist, freelance writer, and lecturer."  I've never heard of her before I happened to pluck this book off a shelf at a local library. It seems designed to give a brief (less than 200 pages long) survey of the field.

Starts with a definition of the "hard problem of consciousness," which as per David Chalmers she understands as the question: how can a physical brain, a measurable structure, give rise to something as ineffable as qualia? "Qualia" is philosopher-speak for private experiences, all the severable droplets int he stream of consciousness. Blackmore notes that Chalmers invented the term "hard problem" to distinguish this question from various easier problems to which philosophers draw are attention when they can't solve the hard one and want to draw our attention from it.

One of my usual procedures with a book like this is to look for the name "William James" in the index. Here there are several page numbers listed next to that name. So Blackmore obviously has some sense of the history of her subject.

Anyone, one of her points, which I'll simply paraphrase here without comment, is that human
experience exhibits a unity of consciousness. Assuming that one is beyond a certain (very young) age and assuming non-pathological conditions. This unity involves three things:

1) At any given moment, there is a unity to the things that "I" am experiencing. The buzzing of the bee is known together with the sight of a blooming flower, and they are known together without confusion.

2) Over time, there is continuity. My present state is understood by introspection to follow from a quite recent state, which in turn followed from one before that, and when I woke up this morning I reconnected with the mind-world that existed as I was falling asleep.

3) There is a "me" somewhere in some sense -- an experiencer as well as a cluster of experiences.

Any full philosophical anthropology will have to account for each of these three unities or, to put it differently, will have to account for this one triple-sensed unity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cancer Breakthrough

Hopeful news in recent days about an old and dear desideratum: a cure for cancer. Or at least for a cancer, and a nasty one at that.

The news comes about because investors in GlaxoSmithKline are greedy for profits, and has already inspired a bit of deregulation to boot. 

The FDA has paved the road for a speedy review of a new BCMA drug for multiple myeloma, essentially cancer of the bone marrow. This means that the US govt has removed some of the hurdles that would otherwise (by decision of the same govt) face a company trying to proceed with these trials expeditiously. 

This has been done because the Phase I clinical trial results have been very promising. The report I've seen indicates that details of these results will be shared with the world on Dec. 11 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Hematology. 

The European Medicines Agency has also given priority treatment to the drug in question. 

GSK's website identifies the drug at issue as "GSK2857916," althou…

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majestic wate…

Hume's Cutlery

David Hume is renowned for two pieces of cutlery, the guillotine and the fork.

Hume's guillotine is the sharp cut he makes between "is" statements and "ought" statements, to make the point that the former never ground the latter.

His "fork" is the division between what later came to be called "analytic" and "synthetic" statements, with the ominous observation that any books containing statements that cannot be assigned to one or the other prong should be burnt.

Actually, I should acknowledge that there is some dispute as to how well or poorly the dichotomy Hume outlines really maps onto the analytic/synthetic dichotomy. Some writers maintain that Hume meant something quite different and has been hijacked. Personally, I've never seen the alleged difference however hard they've worked to point it out to me.

The guillotine makes for a more dramatic graphic than a mere fork, hence the bit of clip art above.

I'm curious whe…