Skip to main content

The Chase

The Chase Poster

Recently saw a 1966 movie called THE CHASE, with amazingly young actors and actresses with famous names -- Robert Redford, Jane Fonda, Angie Dickinson, Robert Duvall, and Marlon Brando were all there. With such a cast, I left the movie a little surprised that it isn't better remembered.

The plot was nothing special -- it involved a man who escapes from a Texas prison, and we see him making his way back to his hometown. For the first half of the movie the story of his voyage across Texas countryside is regularly interrupted by the story of the lives of the people who lived in that hometown, and knew the truth about why this fellow had gone to prison in the first place.

At the midpoint, the convict (Robert Redford) gets back to the town, and the storylines converge.

It isn't really a movie about a "chase" in any conventional sense, even when we see Redford on the lam in the first half we don't really get a sense of watching a chase. But much metaphorical chasing is highlighted.

SPOILER ALERT: I must here give away the ending. The value of the movie isn't in the ending but in the performances, the interaction of the above mentioned stars. So you can watch it with enjoyment especially if you're a fan of any of them, if you chose to read what follows. Still, if you don't want to know more THIS IS WHERE YOU STOP!

Still here? All right then. Near the end of the movie the Marlon Brando character (the town sheriff) has the convict in custody and is escorting him to the jail, which is within the courthouse at the center of town. As they get to the courthouse steps a man steps out of the surrounding crowd and shoots the convict in the stomach. The convict dies and in the subsequent hail of gunfire the vigilante/assassin dies, too.

This incident is the last straw for the sheriff, who is portrayed as having long been dissatisfied with his job. The final scene is the morning after the convict's murder, and we see the sheriff and his wife (this was Angie Dickinson's part)  packing up to leave town.

What strikes me powerfully after watching this movie is that EVERYBODY in 1966 must have had the same impression from the scene of that very public murder on the courthouse steps I've just described. It looked a lot like the killing of Lee Harvey Oswald by Jack Ruby, right down to the typically Texan garb of Brando and the other lawmen present.

I'm left with the sense that it is impossible to watch a 1966 movie in 2017 with 1966 eyes, with the notion that "this scene looks just like something I was shocked to see on live television, a news broadcast, three years ago."


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more