Skip to main content

Fusion Power

 


Fusion Power is a very exciting prospect. Even if it must come contaminated by the snake of statism. It will in time escape from the snake (as space travel so largely has).  

I have a personal theory about the real underlying development of fusion power in recent years. It is a conspiracy theory of sorts, and I hesitate to present it in the present climate. But by the time the lights above my writing desk are powered by commercially successful fusion I will be having a lot to say about it one way or another. 

I think that may be another twenty years from now. And, yes, I have hopes of still being around then, and having people compliment the 84 year old me on how spry I am. 

Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryDecember 21, 2022 at 8:12 AM

    What do you have against snakes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherDecember 21, 2022 at 9:52 PM

      Good question. in "Dragons of Eden," Carl Sagan suggests that the story of the snake in the garden of eden has some old evolutionary truth to it. Snakes were dangerous predators of mammals, and vice versa, for a long stretch in earth's history. Snakes slept during the day and hunted at night, often consuming small mammals in the process. Mammals slept during the night and hunted at day, and found reptilian eggs delicious. That is the reason Genesis portrays a snake as the temptor. I was, I gather, simply reflecting the same old enmity.

      Delete
    2. HenryDecember 22, 2022 at 5:46 AM

      Good answer.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more