Skip to main content

The "commuting to the office" paradigm


One important consideration: COVID-19 didn’t generate trends. It accelerated them. For example, the traditional commute into the office and then back out into the suburbs late in the day was due for a major transformation even before COVID came along. Nonetheless, the virus’ impact to sharpen and refocus the existing trends has been striking.

For decades a large portion of the white collar work force in the United States has lived in suburbs, commuted into "the office" in the morning, then headed back in late afternoon or early evening. It is a paradigm celebrated n stage and screens large and small.

But THAT paradigm was looking rather tired even before Covid hit. The pandemic brought this to clarity -- we can do without it. There are a variety of reasons why we ought to do without it. 

Many firms -- in law, accounting, software development, etc. -- in major cities such as New York and Boston scheduled return-to-work dates as early as the spring of 2021. They then cancelled them. This was on the surface a reaction to the Delta variant (it ain't over yet).  But there was another theme behind the surface, even then and it has become ever more important since. A return to a prior normalcy is not pressing when the normalcy was no all that great, and was running largely on an inertia that has since dispersed.


Comments

  1. Christopher, what is your evidence of the trend before COVID? I was not aware of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People tend to forget already that before Zoom there was Skype. And Skype's dramatic growth was evidence of the increased willingness to work at great distances from one's close colleagues. Skype was released in August 2003. Twenty years ago already. EBay bought it for $2.6 bn two years later. It had roughly 100 million users at the beginning of 2020, before Covid-19 had made its way out of China. Covid clearly didn;t create this market, or the broader need it represents.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak