Skip to main content

In tribute to Ludwig Wittgenstein





Wittgenstein said: "A serious and good philosophical work could be written consisting entirely of jokes."

Here is an example.  At a press conference after an American football game, a reporter asked the coach, "What do you think won this game for you?" The coach, in a puckish mood, replied: "We got more points than the other team." The room laughed.

If you understand that laughter, you may understand the abiding appeal of the analytic/synthetic distinction.  You may also have the beginnings of an understanding of its limits. 

Compare and contrast "we got more points" with "we have a superior offensive line."  

Labels:

Comments

  1. HenrySeptember 14, 2023 at 7:46 AM

    To what limits do you refer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherSeptember 14, 2023 at 9:41 AM

      The illustration shows how the distinction is context specific. The statement "we won because we got more points" would not be a laughing matter, would be perfectly appropriate, if the coach was using his football experience to explain that scoring is different in football than it is in low-number-wins golf. In general, as Quine explained in some depth, efforts to make the synthetic/analytic distinction both clear and binary fail. It turns out to be more of a spectrum than a dichotomy.

      Delete
  2. HenrySeptember 14, 2023 at 11:14 AM

    Thanks, good answer. It has been some 40 years since I read Quine's "Two Dogmas of Empiricism," and I've forgotten his reasoning. But I'm not asking you to explain it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more