Skip to main content

More than a month old but....

 


No, this is not breaking news, (despite my choice of illustration), but it IS fascinating.  And if you missed it (as I would suppose many of you did, as I certainly did) last month, you might be willing to pick up on the matter now.

https://www.rcfp.org/briefs-comments/commonwealth-of-virginia-v-sawye/

The Governor of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, has had the state take an appeal from a trial court order that ordered the disclosure of certain records relating to an emailed tip line. 

What I've linked you to above is an amicus brief from the Reporters' Committee for Freedom of the Press. The underlying lawsuit was brought by American Oversight by the law firm Ballard Spahr. 

It concerns the issue of how state FOIA's ought to be interpreted. "As broadly as the language will bear" would seem a reasonable answer to that question: would it not? 

If you believe so, then you should want the trial court decision in this matter upheld. 

A little background -- the "tip line" is not (as that term may suggest) a telephone number. It is an email address that parents are encouraged to use if they find that their children are being taught negative things ("inherently divisive concepts") in the public schools. The goal seems to be that of developing touching stories that can be used as part of the broader push to jejune-ize the teaching of US history. We'll be back to Parson Weems' tales of George Washington as a boy if this sort of evisceration of any serious study of the subject prevails.

Transparency-activist Heather Sawyer, executive director of American Oversight, quite sensibly wanted to find out how exactly this tip line was working, and filed a sweeping VFOIA request. The Governor's office refused to turn over the phone logs, leaving Sawyer to bring this suit. 

Good for her. Let us keep track of this one. Here is the press release from Ballard Spahr.

https://www.ballardspahr.com/Insights/News/2022/08/Ballard-Spahr-Media-Lawyers-Represent-Watchdog-Group-in-Teacher-Tip-Line-FOIA-Case

Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltSeptember 21, 2023 at 4:18 AM

    Obfuscation continues ( more or less unabated) into the new millennium. I think back on things I DID NOT learn in school, because the *proper authorities* did not want me to learn them. Embarrassments to democracy and other such lapses of due diligence and responsibility. I could write a factual essay on it now, but the point would be rendered moot, the essay would never see publication, and those proper authorities could find other ways to make life miserable. I make no mistake about that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more