Skip to main content

Anna Stubblefield Guilty Plea

Image result for anna stubblefield rutgers

 On March 19, Anna Stubblefield pleaded guilty in a very high profile criminal case.

I don't know off hand whether I have written about it in this blog before.

[Later Insertion. I have not specifically mentioned Stubblefield here -- I have discussed an underlying controversy ....]

 Stubblefield has pleaded guilty to aggravated criminal sexual contact with a man known to the public only as DJ, a man with severe cerebral palsy.

She has claimed that she has been communicating with DJ through "facilitated communication" (FC) and until agreeing to this guilty plea she had taken the view that they had a consensual romantic relationship, consent conveyed through the FC.

 [Later insertion. The validity or otherwise of FC is the underlying controversy mentioned in the first use of brackets above. Nearly two years ago I posted here my review of the Donvan/Zucker book about autism. I briefly discussed FC in that context. Autism was not part of DJ's condition.]

 Sentencing is scheduled for next month.

Although a few true believers in FC remain, it is for the most part now regarded as discredited. One take-away from this case is that pseudo-science movements do real harm. One can't simply take the non-cognitivist attitude that the illusion of communication makes family members feel better, etc. Promoting illusions calls up bad things, summoning events into the real world.

Stubblefield may have been entirely sincere in believing in her 'romance,' but she was in essence using DJ as a sex doll.


Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryApril 1, 2018 at 6:52 AM

    Christopher, what do you mean by "non-cognitivist" in this context? To cite calling up bad things is to use a utilitarian calculation, but so is citing making family members feel better. And isn't utilitarianism cognitive in that its calculations are based on knowledge of empirical facts?

    On another matter, I assume that she could have had the required mens rea even if she was entirely sincere. But her sincerity should significantly reduce her sentence, because, now that she knows that what she did was a crime, despite her sincerity, she presumably would not do it again (in the unlikely event that the opportunity to do so should arise).

    ReplyDelete
  2. ChristopherApril 1, 2018 at 7:54 AM

    Henry, I only meant that one might be tempted to be non-cognitivist about FC itself, refusing to answer the question, "is it actual communication?" that is, "is the output originating from DJ?" Or course the claim that the consequences (happy families) are good is itself a cognitive one. So call the above mentioned temptation a TARGETED non-cognitivism, if you like.

    I agree about the sentence. She'll be a registered sex offender for life. That's a pretty severe penalty in itself. I think sentencing (scheduled for May 7) should probably be "time served." Surely there are better uses for available cell space.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
9 comments
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
17 comments
Read more

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...
4 comments
Read more