Skip to main content

Civilization and Its Discontents

Image result for lightning

This is from Freud's book, Civilization and Its Discontents (1929).

Freud throws off in a footnote a rather wild speculation about the origins of the human use of fire.

I'll just paraphrase most of it, but I'll directly quote a bit at the end.

In primordial days, lightning would strike the branches of trees and set them ablaze in this primordial forest, and primitive people would see the branches, still burning, fall to the ground. Then usually, one or more men would step toward the branch and put out the fire with their urine stream.


Freud presumes that this was very pleasant for the men who did this: a form of sexual excitation, even. Why? Well … it was apparently an Oedipal thing. The father gods in the sky had sent the fire, the men of the tribe were conquering the father gods by pissing on the fire. Aaaaaah, feels good, eh?
The real Prometheus? The real hero who tamed fire for the human species? That was a man who deprived himself of this pleasure by … NOT urinating. Instead of peeing out the blazing branch, this genius took it to some secluded place, surrounded it with kindling, kept it going, so that he and his friends could use it for making rough raw meat more edible.
Freud writes, "By damping down the fire of his own sexual excitation he had tamed the natural force of fire." 
This is what is wonderful about Freud. His pretension to science is always bat-shit crazy, but his imagination is so damn creative that some of his footnotes could make great novels. In this case the novel would be of the Clan-of-the-Cave-Bear genre. 

Comments

  1. The same footnote has another sentence that is both batshit (no hyphen ☺) crazy and evidence of a damn creative imagination: "Further, it is as though woman had been appointed guardian of the fire which was held captive on the domestic hearth, because her anatomy made it impossible for her to yield to the temptation of this desire." So that's why a woman's place is in the home! We should at least give Freud credit for the "as though," which indicates that he apparently doesn't really believe what he says in the sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The sentence you quote raises an obvious question. Why not assume, for the same anatomical reason, the original Prometheus was a woman? Without any temptation to urinate, it occurred to her to move the burning branch to a secluded place and put kindling around it BEFORE the guys ruined things with their usual shenanigans around burning branches. In such a scenario, there is no place for "damping down the metaphorical] fire" to capture the real stuff after all. And women carry handbags to this day, in honor of their foremother's achievement.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The Online Slang Dictionary supports my use of a hyphen in the phrase "bat-shit crazy." http://onlineslangdictionary.com/meaning-definition-of/bat-shit-crazy

    ReplyDelete
  4. Christopher, I am aware that Freud viewed a purse as symbolic of a vagina, but I'm nevertheless not sure that I understand your "handbags" remark. Pace The Online Slang Dictionary, if you google "bat-shit," almost every hit on the first page has "batshit." (One has "batsh*t" to protect the sensitive among us.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you think of an earth-toned handbag you can see it as an almost log-like accessory, and thus as a tribute to the feminine Prometheus carrying the branch away. That's all I was going for.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

Recent Controversies Involving Nassim Taleb, Part I

I've written about Nassim Taleb on earlier occasions in this blog. I'll let you do the search yourself, dear reader, for the full background. The short answer to the question "who is Taleb?" is this: he is a 57 year old man born in Lebanon, educated in France, who has been both a hedge fund manager and a derivatives trader. He retired from active participation from the financial world sometime between 2004 and 2006, and has been a full-time writer and provocateur ever since. Taleb's writings for the general public began where one might expect -- in the field where he had made his money -- and he explained certain financial issues to a broad audiences in a very dramatic non-technical way. Since then, he has widened has fields of study, writing about just about everything, applying the intellectual tools he honed in that earlier work. As you might have gather from the above, I respect Taleb, though I have sometimes been critical of him when my own writing ab...