Skip to main content

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge II

Image result for lisa murkowski images

So: if it isn't the consequence of a push by the oil companies, why ARE parts of ANWR on the verge of being opened for drilling?

Three closely related reasons come to mind. First, because the Murkowski family has a long memory.  Second, because the US budgetary/legislative process is badly broken. Third, because even if the corporations are not enthusiastic, once the opening takes place there WILL be bids for the rights to drill specified parcels, and the US government badly needs new revenue streams given its state of indebtedness.

Late in the Clinton administration (back when Big Oil WAS pressing the point) the House of Representatives voted in favor of a bill to allow some drilling, and Alaskan Senator Frank Murkowski pressed for Senate passage, but couldn't pull it off. Alaska is now represented in the Senate by Lisa Murkowski, Frank's daughter, the woman portrayed above, and she is fervent about the family tradition on this point.

T o Ms Murkowski is due apparently the insight that opening ANWR is a budget issue since royalties could earn the federal government a fair chunk of money.

Senate Democrats, led by Senator Maria Cantwell of Washington State, have called the budgetary treatment of the issue a “sneak attack,” and a pretext for turning “public land over to polluters."

But Cantwell’s bill blocking the inclusion of this matter in the budget resolution failed by a party line vote, 48 to 52. Only one Democrat voted against the measure (and thus in favor of opening up part of ANWR – specifically the 1002 lands – to drilling.) That was Joe Manchin, of West Virginia.
Also, only one Republican voted in favor of the Cantwell bill. That was Susan Collins, of Maine.

I believe it was a couple of days later that the total package came to its vote in the Senate, and then (October 19), the margin was even narrower, 51-49, but the bill did pass and was sent into the hands of the House of Representatives. Susan Collins voted with the rest of the Republican caucus. The only Republican who voted "no" on October 19 was Rand Paul. Paul's reasons for that "no" vote had nothing to do with ANWR.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more