We move on now to the headline constitutional issues: the one-person one-vote rule; separation of powers; coerced speech in the labor union context. Last year at this time, I mentioned that the SCOTUS had agreed to hear Evenwel v. Abbott. This case gave the court a chance to clarify the meaning of "one person, one vote," where appellants asked it to reconstrue that as "one qualified potential voter, one vote." SCOTUS' answer: the appellant loses. The states may divide themselves into congressional districts on the basis of total population without inquiries into eligibility. They get to choose. The decision left open the possibility that some state may decide to re-work its district lines according to the number of eligible voters in each. If any state does so and that practice is challenged, only then will we get a more definitive word, I gather. This decision was unanimous. Thomas and Alito wrote concurring opinions. Thomas joined in Alit...