I may be thought to be a Martian anthropologist working on Venus here, but I have to say a few words about the feminism of the 21st century. As I understand it, there is an important divide between what we may call "identity feminists" on the one hand, and the Ruth Bader Ginsburg sort, whom one might call 'radical feminists," on the other. Let's just say IF and RF hereafter for short. I'll call the latter "radical" because that is a term that used to be hurtled at them as an insult, sometimes as part of larger constructions such as 'TERF,' because many of them have adopted it, and because it should in this context give no offense. After all, how can it be a bad thing to get to the 'root' of a matter? The contention of RF is that many (most? all?) societies have for a long time given women ("female bodied women" if that phrase is really considered necessary!), a raw deal and that people of that description ought to ...