Skip to main content

The Fauci diaries

 


I didn't say much about the pandemic during the pandemic, even here in my hobby blog.

I don't believe I've even commented on the much discussed question, for example, of whether Dr. Fauci was a national deliverer or a fraud.  

Now I can and will say though: he might have been both. But for purposes of narrowing the field a bit, let's discuss the respect in which he might have been a fraud. 

Fauci did a good deal during the pandemic to persuade Americans that Covid-19 had its origin in China's wet markets -- places where fresh (newly dead) animals are sold for food in open air settings. 

But the diaries help make it clear that he did not believe this to be the origin.  He understood that the real origin of Covid-19 had a very likely tie to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a lab in Wuhan, China. 

Comer and Jordan say, "Excerpts of emails we are making public today reveal that Dr. Fauci was warned of two things .... the potential that COVID-19 leaked from the Wuhan Institute ... and 2) the possibility that the virus was intentionally genetically manipuated." 

Big, and a bad thing to have helped cover up, if that is in fact what Fauci did. I have no admiration for Messrs Comer and Jordan, but they may have stumbled onto a valuable point here. 


Labels:

Comments

  1. HenryAugust 4, 2026 at 3:36 PM

    Two questions. (1) Did Comer and Jordan make the excerpts of emails public and, if so, did the emails, despite being only excerpts, confirm their claims? One should otherwise assume that they are lying. (2) If Fauci did what they accuse him of, what might his motive have been?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ChristopherAugust 6, 2026 at 12:38 AM

      Henry, Good questions. Actually, it was Rand Paul who made the material public, as chair of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security. In the statement I quoted above, Comer and Jordan as members of the House Oversight Committee are riding on the Senator's coattails a bit when they use the pronoun "we.' At any rate, you can read the public material here: https://www.paul.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/2026.07.24_Tonys-Diary-Package.pdf One comment that warrants my observations above may be found at p. 13 of the pdf to which I just linked you (page 681 of the voluminous typed underlying document being excerpted here.) Look at the final paragraph of 13/681, part of a long entry made on January 31, 2020 by our diarist. The paragraph begins, "When I got back to my office, I got call from...." I found this bit very eye-opening. I'll address your second good question separately.

      Delete
    2. ChristopherAugust 6, 2026 at 12:46 AM

      Continuing. What might Fauci's motive have been? You've known me for a few years, and you know I am not inclined to chase conspiratorial rabbit holes. Since my self-conversion out of anarcho-cap presumptions I am probably less inclined than I was. Let us presume the best of motives. Fauci seems to be a serious public servant He might have believed that bellicosity would harm the cause of viral containment. He may have worried that a US/China diplomatic showdown, or public pressure FOR such a showdown, would be a very bad thing and would detract from the effort to get people to wear masks, keep social distances, etc. So in the midst of the latter effort he may have participated in a cover-up of the truth about the involvement of the Wuhan Lab.

      Delete
    3. HenryAugust 6, 2026 at 10:59 AM

      The url in your first reply takes us to Rand Paul's website, but not to anything relevant to Fauci. It provides Paul's constituents with a phone number to receive help with any federal government agency. It doesn't mention that Paul and every other Republican member of Congress have allowed Trump to prevent agencies from carrying out their statutory missions.

      Delete
    4. ChristopherAugust 6, 2026 at 2:47 PM

      Henry, That's bizarre. It appears something that was formerly at that URL (the URL itself after all contains the phrase "Tony's Diary,") has been taken down and you've been redirected. You might try this URL instead: https://www.paul.senate.gov/readingroom/ That is a menu of "reading room" items. -- if you scroll down a bit you'll find one dated July 25. You'll see a large rectangle with a smaller rectangle inside it (left bottom corner). Click on the smaller rectangle. It appears you can still reach the material from there. There you can follow my earlier instruction, page 13/681.

      Delete
  2. ChristopherAugust 6, 2026 at 2:05 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...
24 comments
Read more

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...
10 comments
Read more

The Growing Block Theory of Time

My own disposition, in regard to the philosophy of time, is toward the "growing block" theory. This is the view that past events remain realities, that present-moment events are also realities, but that future events are not yet real. The image is of the universe as a block with an edge on (say) the right-hand side. The block is expanding because that edge is moving ever further right, and that edge is what we call the present, or, simply, "now." Everything to the left of that edge is both static (the past is complete) and, still and forever, real. Think of the phrase "the moving finger writes." The chief alternatives to the growing-block theory are "presentism" (only the now-edge itself is real) and "eternalism" (past, present, and future are all real." I believe that time is a growing block because (1) that's what it feels like, (2) we should stick with the introspective phenomenon unless we have good reason to abandon ...
8 comments
Read more