My quote from Brandom about inferentialism earlier this week has me thinking. Consider the following inference. If a flower bed contains only geraniums and violas then it contains no roses. This flower bed contains only geraniums and violas. Thus, this flower bed contains no roses. That seems straightforward although it is more Stoic than Aristotelean, and to some minds the "if ... then" of Stoi logic sounds question begging. Could we put it in more categorical syllogistic form if we wanted to? I suppose so. We would want to make explicit the premise that the different types of flowers are mutually exclusive: that is, a geranium is reliably not a rose. Couldn't there be a hybrid? I have no idea, but I'm presuming any hybrid gera-rose would be neither geranium nor rose. Even with a gera-rose, every flower in this flower bed has been identified as to type, and in each case the type is non-rose. Reasoning as process of elimination. Just think...
I turned on CNN on the morning of August 7th. Yes, I do sometimes get news from the television, rather than the net. Boomers endure! Anyway: I turned it on and was immediately hit with the release of the July jobs numbers. Dismal. Of course the administration keeps telling us the economy is great, best ever, and that anything negative anyone might say about the US economy is fake news. Even when their own flunkies provide the numbers. This is from their Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employment Situation Summary - 2026 M07 Results There is, admittedly, something Orwellian in the wording of the report itself. It says, "Both nonfarm payroll employment (-23,000) and the unemployment rate (4.1 percent) changed little in July." The number, 23,000 nonfarm jobs lost in one month, is startling. But it is covered by a soothing word. That change is "little". Betweem a bureaucrat's startling numbers and his soothing words -- be...