On the off chance that anyone who has anything to do with the Democratic Party in Maine is reading this ... first, shame on you. I used to identify as a dissident Republican, way back when that meant John Anderson ... and in large part because of that autobiographical fact, I would love to see Senator Collins removed from public life. She is the master (too gendered?) -- the prodigy at pretending to be that sort of Republican -- but always backing down and falling in line when it matters. Her games playing helped give us DOBBS v. JACKSON effectively extinguishing the privacy right from the 14th amendment. [No, they haven't overturned GRISWOLD yet -- but I wouldn't want a test case on that to come before this court anytime soon.] Anyway it was important, my hypothetical Maine-Dem-operative reader, for you lot to come up with someone solid who could run against Collins this year. You had ONE JOB!!! Boy did you fail on that. And don't ask me...
Yesterday I paid tribute here to a great mathematician. Today I offer a quote from him. "To those who ask what the infinitely small quantity in mathematics is, we answer that it is actually zero. Hence there are not so many mysteries hidden in this concept as there are usually believed to be." The significance of that observation may not be obvious outside of some consideration of the history of math, the development of calculus in particular. But once we do a little grappling with that history, we see that Euler is making a point here that takes us back to ancient Greece. Back to Zeno, Achilles and tortoise. If Achilles is to catch up with the tortoise there must be a moment at which the difference between them is zero. One way of looking at the problem is to ask what is the next lower number -- one really really close to zero but still a positive number! Euler here is saying "That is the wrong way of looking at it." Or, "don't create my...