Nietzsche (1844 - 1900) was a fascinating and powerful thinker whom I do not think I discuss enough in this place.
But someone asked a question on Quora thus: whether there was anyone who continued Nietzsche's work in something akin to the way in which Hegel continued that of Kant. There are many ways I might have gone about answering it.
To be quite honest, the querent actually mentioned how "Kant" had continued the work of "Hegel". That is a chronological absurdity of course, so I presume that Kant (1724 -1804) and Hegel (1770 - 1831) were simply reversed in the question by typographical haste.
If as I suspect the querent meant to ask about a continuance of Nietzsche in the manner of the continuance of Kant by Hegel, we also have to consider what kind of continuance THAT is. I infer that the querent meant not someone calling him/herself a Nietzschean and dedicated to exegesis of a Master, but someone who continued-with-a-difference.
So I replied that the best examples that come to mind are meta-historians. Their philosophical point of view allowed each to see human history on a really Grand Scale, and each ended up seeing something akin to the Nietzschean 'eternal recurrence'.
I referred here to Oswald Spengler (1880 - 1936) and Arnold J. Toynbee. (1889 - 1975).
Perhaps this is an odd connection of ideas on my part. I'll just leave it here, though, and perhaps come back to it next week.
Comments
Post a Comment