Skip to main content

Andrew's Brain II

Mini Cute Girl Doll 6in Height Full Set Doll with Dolls Outfits Makeup Kids  Toys

More on the novel, Andrew's Brain, by Doctorow. 

We discover soon after the passage I quoted yesterday that the narrative voice saying "I can tell you about my friend, Andrew" is himself Andrew.  He has a proclivity for speaking of himself, and I submit a proclivity for seeing himself, in the third person.

This discovery has weight in the unfolding of the not-especially-narrative tale. For one of the key themes here is the relation of mind to brain, of a self to its physical stratum.  And one might say that to the extent we reduce self to brain, we are trying to escape from the responsibilities of a first person point of view, into a world in which there is no subject, there is only the third person. 

The first chapter is the longest in the book, going 50 pages. That is one-quarter the length of the book though there are eleven chapters. That is not remarkable -- the long first chapter feels like leisurely scene setting. 

Anyway: as the second chapter opens we have received no answer yet to the question: how did Briony die? It appears possible that she died in childbirth. That, if true, would give some extra poignancy to that first scene, in which Andrew presses his infant child upon his ex-wife. 

Early in the second chapter, we get an odd sort of call-back to that scene.  Andrew, again talking about himself in the third person, says "As a boy one winter afternoon Andrew appeared at the door of his little girlfriend to return the doll he'd stolen from her. His mother had insisted that he do this, knock on the door and not give any excuse ... just to say he'd taken the doll when she wasn't looking and he was sorry and would never do anything like that again.Andrew did as he was told." 

[The above photo is of a perfectly random doll with no connection to this novel.]

In that little story the use of the third-person voice fulfills a complicated role.  Mother apparently wanted her boy to learn something about taking responsibility for one's actions.  Andrew talks about what Andrew did as a matter of doing as he was told, by way of escaping responsibility for having participated in a responsibility-accepting ritual.

 But by this time we have gotten somewhat to know the therapist to whom Andrew is doing a lot of talking ... about Andrew.  He -- the patient -- tells that story about the stolen doll and a couple of other stories from the same era in his life, when he was seven years old or so in Montcalm, New Jersey, or when he was just eight in New York City.  Then he says, self-reflexively, "There you have it.  Early Andrew.  I'm presuming you like childhoods." 

Responds the therapist, "Well, they can be instructive."  

Indeed they can.  All of his childhood stories portray Andrew as both desirous of and evasive with regard to responsibility for his own actions and their consequences.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...