Skip to main content

Start with something simple and true


There's an old story about Ernest Hemingway. Faced with a bad case of writer's block he overcame it by telling himself, when faced with the dreaded blank page, to begin by writing something simple and true.

I often remind myself of this, especially when faced with the difficulty of writing about a complicated subject.  When complexity IS the block, start with something simple and true.

Not long ago, for my monthly newsletter, the first issue of the new year 2026, I had given myself the challenge of writing a brief item about artificial intelligence. Then I froze.  I'm not an expert on the field.  I know of coding only what a late 1970s course on APL could teach me.  [If you really ARE into computer science, you're giggling at that sentence.) 

So I started with this sort of intentional simplicity.  "The year 2025 may go down in history with a lot of labels." It may indeed. Getting just a little braver having taken that step, I continued, "But I, for one, would insist that one of those labels should be 'peak year for confidence in AI.'"

And THAT got the ball rolling.  Block broken. Confidence in AI openly doubted -- the admission meant that MY confidence in myself was restored.  That newsletter item, and yesterday's post here, and a fair amount of other writing I have done since, has been the water flowing through this broken dam. 

Thank you, Ernest. 


Comments

  1. Hemingway wrote fiction, so he might have had a writer’s block when he didn’t know how to start his story or how to proceed with it. I write only nonfiction, and I’ve never had writer’s block. That is because, when I’m writing nonfiction, I know what I want to say. Choosing the right words might be a problem, but I can work on that; it doesn’t create a writer’s block.

    It seems that, when you decided to write about AI, you didn’t know what you wanted to say. You had picked a subject to write about of which you knew little about. If I were ever in that situation, I'd research the subject and then, knowing something about it, I don't think that I'd have writer's block. But I can't imagine being in that situation, because I write only when I have something to say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When I am writing nonfiction, there is often a block created NOT by the idea that I don't know what to say (never true), nor by the fact of my ignorance (always true, but easy enough to address in most instances). The block is the presence of too much that might be said. Various possible ledes all competing to be THE lede. This was the situation with AI. The rule of starting with something "simple and true," with a focus especially on the simple part, since all the competitors would be, so far as I know and am concerned, true. Suppose I wanted to write about a certain recently-initiated war. Starting right off with a statement about the Strait of Hormuz and the amount of hydrocarbons that pass through it in peacetime? That is a possibility, might lead to something interesting, but really isn't simple. How about something about Donald Trump's "no forever wars" pretenses? Again, it has promise, but only if I want to continue down a particular path, and other paths may press on me. How about "Killing schoolchildren is wrong"? Would lead to a very different piece and is a lot simpler than either of the other two. When I cure myself of writers block it is by getting to something like that.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a maj...

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak...

The Lyrics of "Live Like You Were Dying"

Back in 2004 Tim McGraw recorded the song "Live Like You were Dying." As a way of marking the one-decade anniversary of this song, I'd like to admit that a couple of the lines have confused me for years. I could use your help understanding them. In the first couple of verses, the song seems easy to follow. Two men are talking, and one tells the other about his diagnosis. The doctors have (recently? or a long time ago and mistakenly? that isn't clear) given him the news that he would die soon. "I spent most of the next days/Looking at the X-rays." Then we get a couple of lines about a man crossing items off of his bucket list. "I went sky diving, I went rocky mountain climbing, I went two point seven seconds on a bull named Fu Man Chu." Then the speaker -- presumably still the old man -- shifts to the more characterological consequences of the news. As he was doing those things, he found he was loving deeper and speaking sweeter, and givin...