Skip to main content

Tarred and Feathered

Tarring and feathering

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarring_and_feathering

The photo here is of John Meints, a German-American farmer who was tarred and feathered in Minnesota in August 1918.

Yes, I know today is Pearl Harbor day and my thoughts may seem to have turned to the 'wrong' World War. But hey, I can't tame them to obey a calender.

I include Meints' photo here as a reminder that racism can victimize anyone, even those nasty "north Europeans."

And to suggest that when it happens we should call it "racism," and not use word magic to try to say that Meints was the victim of something else, or wasn't really a victim at all.

Comments

  1. Before World War I, H.L. Mencken, who was of German descent, was an anti-black racist. As a result of the prejudice he faced during World War I, he realized how black people felt, and he became an advocate for their civil rights. That shows an admirable capacity to empathize. It would be good if the anti-defamation leagues and civil rights groups that look out for Italians, Jews, African Americans, and all other groups combined into one, because we are all of the human race, and, if one segment of us is discriminated against, then we should care as much as if it is our segment.

    But what Meints, Mencken, and other German-Americans experienced during World War I was not racism, and it is not "word magic" to use a more accurate word. Unfortunately, however, I am not aware of one. "National-origin discrimination" is not only awkward, but is often inaccurate, because Mencken (I don't know about Meints) was not of German origin; his forebears were.

    Sometimes national-origin prejudice and racism overlap. Trump's bigotry again Latin American immigrants is both, as he has acknowledged that he'd welcome Norwegian immigrants. His bigotry is racism as well as national-origin discrimination because people from Latin America tend not to look like Northern Europeans. This is not only because people from Spain tend not to look like Northern Europeans (though they are of the same race), but because people from Latin America tend to have forebears of African or Native American ancestry (making them in part of a different race from Northern Europeans). Even if some Latin American people could pass for Northern European, it doesn't seem too much of a stretch to say that they are victims of Trump's racism.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak