Skip to main content

The Fellow Sitting Next to Me Told the Truth

 School Bus Clipart stock illustration. Illustration of playground ...

I remember a day on the bus on the way to school when I was in eighth grade, probably in the early spring of 1972.

A non-untypical event took place that day, in a long period of my life when I was constantly being bullied, most vociferously on the bus.

An asshat seated behind me poured perfume down my neck. I will refer to him hereafter simply as Asshat without article.

On this day, as it happens, I remained dry-eyed and rather Stoic about the perfume thing. I don't know why. Perhaps my mind was simply somewhere else. There would have been times when I would have reacted in a way that Asshat and friends would have found amusing. But this time I just sat there.

Asshat was annoyed by the non-response (which annoyance, I confess, delighted me). Since he couldn't see anything but the back of my head, he couldn't plausibly, even by his loose standards of plausibility, joyously proclaim that I was crying. So he asked the fellow sitting next to me -- whose name I have forgotten, but I'll just say The Fellow -- "is he crying?"

The Fellow could have lied. And it might have had its psychic rewards. Certainly none of my experience with this crowd suggests that there was any powerful disincentive.  But, to his karmic credit, The Fellow said simply, "no."

Asshat: "Then why isn't he doing anything?"

That question sat in the air, and then Asshat found some other subject to occupy himself with as the bus lumbered onward.

So here is my long-delayed anything. Thank you, The Fellow, for that monosyllabic truth.

I enjoyed it, Asshat didn't. All was good. To be more mature and articulate about the strain of Stoicism I seem to have for once exhibited that day than I could have been then: I was learning not to react when reaction could be of no value.





Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak