Skip to main content

Reason to Hope

 


There is reason to hope that the "stop the steal" stuff is on the retreat at last, away from the center toward the margin of political discourse in the United States. 

In January, of course, the Republicans lost two critical seats in the U.S. Senate because of an impossibly mixed message to their base, "Your vote doesn't really matter. It will be changed by nasty Dominion voting machines and by the machinations of child-abusing traitors. Yet you ought to get out and vote!" The first part of that overwhelmed the second, the Democrats did get out their vote, and they won both Senate seats from Georgia.

The mixed message wasn't quite as absurd and self-defeating as it seems, though. We have had reason to worry over the intervening months that the message is "elections don't matter in general, they are always a charade, so a military coup wouldn't be such a bad thing -- it would be just a little more honest."

And THAT message is a truly vicious one. So it is a good thing when, as I began, we have reason to hope that it is on the retreat. 

Here are three facts that support hope:

1) The former guy now can't even get Omarosa to shut up. He looks rather pathetic, fighting and losing such battles as this.   

2) His buddies in Arizona have given up on their effort to make believe that he won there. They seem to be saying that Biden's victory was by a slightly larger margin than originally announced. One imagines with delight his impotent fury at this news. "You had ONE JOB! Sneak some bamboo ballots into the piles and then 'discover' them and express shock. How difficult could that have been????" 

3) The top ranks of the U.S. military, god bless them, have been very clear that they will not lend themselves to any military coup. At least not by General Bone Spurs and the trumpeters. 

These and other developments are slowly separating our political bloodstream from the poison. We may survive all of this and get back to something like normal politics yet. 

Which brings me to the lady portrayed above: Liz Cheney. The trumpeters very much want to Show Their Power by getting rid of her. She has now announced a high profile trip to ... New Hampshire. One knows what that means.

She is confident she will keep her seat in the House in 2022, which means I take it both that she believes she will get the necessary votes against any primary challenge (there is no significant Democratic challenge in Wyoming) and that the votes will be fairly-enough counted for that to matter. Further, come what may in 2022, she is prepared to take the offensive and wage a national campaign in 2024. 

I have no interest in seeing a Cheney in the White House. Zero. Zippo. But at the moment this one is doing God's work.

As they say in the Cheney household, "may the road rise up to meet you and may the devil provide you with somebody else's heart when you need it to carry on." 

 

Comments

  1. When you need it to carry what? Is that final "it" correct?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Sir/Madam,

    Do you need a loan? Does your firm, company or industry need financial assistance? Do you need finance to start your business? Do you need personal loan? Loan for your home improvements Mortgage loan Debt consolidation loan Commercial loan Education loan Car loan Loan for assets. Contact us today with for your loan request. and many more at 3% interest rate; Contact us via email: markthomasfinanceltd@gmail.com
    *Refinancing Loans
    * Car Loan
    *Truck Loans
    * Home Loan
    * Mortgage Loan
    * Debt Consolidation Loan
    * Business Loan [secure and unsecured]
    * Personal Loan [secure and unsecured]
    * Students Loan and so many others.

    apply@ronniefinance.ltd
    http://ronniefinance.ltd/fastloan
    Whats-App no +919667837169
    Dr. Mark Thomas

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak