Skip to main content

History Since 1984: A List of Stuff Part A

 




Today and tomorrow I will present a timeline of the last 38 years. Just one event per year. With little organization. Just think of this as a lot of stuff that happened. If we try to think of them as the "most important events" of their respective years, some of the choices will seem a tad eccentric. 

1984, The Sino-British Joint Declaration sets out plans for a transition of Hong Kong to PRC sovereignty.

1985, Microsoft releases Window 1.0

1986, The launch of the Fox Broadcasting Co.

1987. The US FDA approves the marketing of Prozac.

1988. This was the year of the peak of the insider trading scandal that made Rudolph Giuliani a person of importance.  Drexel Burnham pleaded guilty this year. 

1989. This was the year of the SATANIC VERSES controversy involving the Ayatollah Khomeini and Salman Rushdie.

1990. East and West Germany re-unite after decades of separation.

1991. The Soviet Union dissolves itself.

1992. The European Union comes into being, as a stronger and more political unity than the "common market" by which it had been preceded.

1993. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is confirmed by each of the three national legislatures involved.

1994. The US Supreme Court announces an important "establishment of religion" case, Kiryas Joel Village.

1995. The Washington Post and the New York Times publish the Unabomber's manifesto. 

1996. The year the Olympics came to Atlanta, Georgia, with disastrous consequences for one private security guard, who was wrongly charged with the bombing of Centennial Olympic Park.

1997. The death of Diana, Princess of Wales.

1998. The collapse of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) puts hedge funds into the vocabulary of the common folk. 

1999. the Euro is established as a currency, and the European Central Bank assumes full powers throughout the currency's zone. 

2000. The US Supreme Court for the first time in its history intervenes decisively in the outcome of a Presidential election, in BUSH v. GORE. 

2001. Al Qaeda attacks US targets and kills thousands.

2002. The US Dept of Homeland Security is brought into existence.

2003.  The United States forces an end to the Ba'athist regime of Saddam Hussein. Most Americans are likely under the impression that this had something to do with the Al Qaeda attack two years before. It does not. 

TO BE CONTINUED.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers