Skip to main content

The Trump Tapes


 Bob Woodward has put out a new audiobook, The Trump Tapes. It gives you open access to the former president's mind in a way that little else that is now out there can do. 

Unfortunately, this is not yet a historical matter. A big chunk of the electorate looks to Donald Trump as its champion against tyranny, and believes that he is playing some version of multi-dimensional chess. My own guess is that the big chunk will not be big enough to make him President again. Even his Republican flunkies are unlikely to sign up for another ride, and some of them -- his former Vice President chief among them -- have been candid about that. 

Of course there is something about becoming the potential lynchee that may well have turned Pence against a lynch mob of which he had once been fond. Together with the Democratic Party in this though in little else, he and others similarly situated will likely prevent a re-run, whatever happens in next week's vote. 

Yet Trump will remain a force, and he skews our politics in a vicious way. It is a force that requires resistance.

I will leave further discussion to this source:  https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/interactive/2022/trump-tapes-bob-woodward-interviews-audiobook/


Comments

  1. I am not as optimistic as you are. For one thing, I believe that Pence has absolutely no influence, even combined with others, to prevent a rerun. For another, although Trump would lose the popular vote by even more than he did in 2016 and 2020, we still have to contend with the Electoral College and with the Republicans' increased ability to steal the election by state legislatures overriding the popular vote in some states.

    Our best preventative measure against this may be to invoke section 3 of the 14th Amendment. It provides that no one may hold federal or state office who has engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States. The problem with invoking this provision is that the current Supreme Court, which does not consider itself bound by the Constitution, might hold the provision inapplicable to Trump.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak