Skip to main content

Justice Jackson's first written opinion


I have nothing to say about Tuesday's election. 

Hence the illustration, such as it is, attached.

I will take this opportunity to observe, though, that Monday saw the first written opinion handed down by the Supreme Court's newest Justice,  Ketanji Brown Jackson. 

It was issued in dissent: she will become accustomed to that. She was writing for herself and Sotomayor, (they didn't have Kagan on board this time). They would have saved the life of death-row inmate Davel Chinn, accepting the contention that the state of Ohio had suppressed evidence that might have altered the outcome of his trial. 

Jackson would have granted the writ and summarily reversed in order to require the Sixth Circuit to conduct a proper materiality analysis on the suppressed evidence.

The brief dissent is at the end of a lengthy order list issued Monday. 

:  Order List (11/07/2022) (supremecourt.gov)

Labels:

Comments

  1. Paul D. Van PeltNovember 10, 2022 at 4:54 AM

    I have nothing to say about Ohio, other than, I live here. Justice Brown-Jackson will become accustomed to many nuances associated with being an associate. She will, to whatever degree, be under the influence of older and wiser(?) minds, will butt heads with them from time to time. The judicial pot needs to be stirred and freshened now and then. There were, are, members who never should have been there. Don't expect me to name names. As to the expansive void, I fully agree.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Story About Coleridge

This is a quote from a memoir by Dorothy Wordsworth, reflecting on a trip she took with two famous poets, her brother, William Wordsworth, and their similarly gifted companion, Samuel Taylor Coleridge.   We sat upon a bench, placed for the sake of one of these views, whence we looked down upon the waterfall, and over the open country ... A lady and gentleman, more expeditious tourists than ourselves, came to the spot; they left us at the seat, and we found them again at another station above the Falls. Coleridge, who is always good-natured enough to enter into conversation with anybody whom he meets in his way, began to talk with the gentleman, who observed that it was a majestic waterfall. Coleridge was delighted with the accuracy of the epithet, particularly as he had been settling in his own mind the precise meaning of the words grand, majestic, sublime, etc., and had discussed the subject with William at some length the day before. “Yes, sir,” says Coleridge, “it is a majesti
7 comments
Read more

Five Lessons from the Allegory of the Cave

  Please correct me if there are others. But it seems to be there are five lessons the reader is meant to draw from the story about the cave.   First, Plato  is working to devalue what we would call empiricism. He is saying that keeping track of the shadows on the cave wall, trying to make sense of what you see there, will NOT get you to wisdom. Second, Plato is contending that reality comes in levels. The shadows on the wall are illusions. The solid objects being passed around behind my back are more real than their shadows are. BUT … the world outside the the cave is more real than that — and the sun by which that world is illuminated is the top of the hierarchy. So there isn’t a binary choice of real/unreal. There are levels. Third, he equates realness with knowability.  I  only have opinions about the shadows. Could I turn around, I could have at least the glimmerings of knowledge. Could I get outside the cave, I would really Know. Fourth, the parable assigns a task to philosophers
Post a Comment
Read more

Searle: The Chinese Room

John Searle has become the object of accusations of improper conduct. These accusations even have some people in the world of academic philosophy saying that instructors in that world should try to avoid teaching Searle's views. That is an odd contention, and has given rise to heated exchanges in certain corners of the blogosphere.  At Leiter Reports, I encountered a comment from someone describing himself as "grad student drop out." GSDO said: " This is a side question (and not at all an attempt to answer the question BL posed): How important is John Searle's work? Are people still working on speech act theory or is that just another dead end in the history of 20th century philosophy? My impression is that his reputation is somewhat inflated from all of his speaking engagements and NYRoB reviews. The Chinese room argument is a classic, but is there much more to his work than that?" I took it upon myself to answer that on LR. But here I'll tak
13 comments
Read more